The Top 6 TSX Alternatives for TypeScript Development

TSX has gained significant traction among developers for running TypeScript files directly without manual compilation steps. Its modern approach and integration with Node.js make it a popular choice for TypeScript development.

However, TSX isn't without limitations. It lacks built-in type checking, has a substantial installation size, and may not suit all project architectures or performance requirements. Fortunately, several outstanding alternatives can address these gaps.

This guide examines the six most compelling alternatives to TSX.

TSX key features

TSX really stands out with its simple and fast approach. It makes running TypeScript in Node.js straightforward, supports both CommonJS and ESM modules, and has a handy watch mode to make development easier. The tool automatically manages tsconfig.json path mappings and provides a smooth REPL experience for interactive work.

The top 6 alternatives to TSX for TypeScript development in 2025

Before exploring each tool individually, here's a feature comparison to illustrate how they measure against each other:

1. Node.js Native TypeScript Support

Node.js has officially enabled native TypeScript support by default in version 22.18.0, representing a major breakthrough in TypeScript development. This native implementation uses type stripping to execute TypeScript files directly without external dependencies, fundamentally altering your TypeScript workflow.

🌟 Key features

• Native TypeScript execution enabled by default (no flags required)
• Type stripping approach for optimal performance
• Zero external dependencies or configuration needed
• Direct integration with all Node.js runtime features

➕ Pros

• Removes the need for any external tools like TSX, giving you the ultimate zero-dependency solution
• Delivers exceptional performance through highly tuned native implementation in the Node.js runtime
• Guarantees long-term stability and compatibility as an official Node.js feature
• Gives you access to all Node.js APIs and features without compatibility concerns

➖ Cons

• Does not perform type checking during execution, requiring separate tools for static type analysis
• Lacks TypeScript development conveniences like built-in watch mode and REPL functionality
• Limited to supported TypeScript syntax as documented in the official Node.js TypeScript documentation

2. Bun

Bun represents a complete reimagining of JavaScript runtime environments, functioning as an all-in-one tool that replaces several development utilities. Built specifically for speed, Bun executes TypeScript faster than most alternatives while maintaining full compatibility with existing Node.js applications.

🌟 Key features

• Native TypeScript and JSX/TSX execution without configuration
• Integrated package manager, bundler, and test runner
• Exceptional startup and execution performance
• Drop-in replacement for Node.js applications

➕ Pros

• Runs TypeScript files 2-3x faster than TSX during startup, making development cycles noticeably quicker
• Combines runtime, package manager, bundler, and test runner in one solution, reducing toolchain complexity
• Works with existing npm packages and Node.js applications without modification
• Built-in enhancements benefit both development and production environments

➖ Cons

• Newer ecosystem means fewer community resources and third-party integrations compared to established Node.js tooling
• Limited debugging tool support, particularly for complex applications requiring specialized debugging features
• Some Node.js APIs may have subtle compatibility differences, potentially causing issues in edge cases

3. Deno

Deno was created by the original Node.js author as a modern JavaScript and TypeScript runtime built around security and developer productivity. Where TSX operates as a layer on top of Node.js, Deno runs TypeScript natively with zero configuration required.

🌟 Key features

• Native TypeScript support with built-in type checking
• Security-first architecture with explicit permissions
• Complete standard library
• URL-based module system eliminating node_modules

➕ Pros

• Runs TypeScript files natively without requiring additional tooling or configuration
• Built-in security prevents scripts from accessing files, network, or environment variables without explicit permission
• Includes essential development tools like linting, formatting, and testing out of the box
• Eliminates npm dependency headaches with direct URL imports and built-in caching

➖ Cons

• Migrating existing Node.js projects requires significant architectural changes, while TSX drops in easily
• Smaller package ecosystem compared to npm, potentially limiting access to specific libraries
• Learning curve around new concepts like the permission system and URL-based imports

4. vite-node

vite-node harnesses Vite's transformation pipeline to execute TypeScript and JavaScript files in Node.js. While TSX takes a focused approach, vite-node brings Vite's entire plugin ecosystem and development tools to server-side execution.

🌟 Key features

• Vite's complete plugin system and transformation pipeline
• Hot Module Replacement (HMR) support for development
• On-demand evaluation with intelligent caching
• Integration with Vite configuration files

➕ Pros

• Grants access to Vite's extensive plugin ecosystem, enabling advanced transformations that TSX cannot handle
• Hot Module Replacement speeds up development iteration cycles significantly
• Handles complex module resolution and aliasing better than most alternatives through Vite's resolver
• Powers production tools like Vitest and Nuxt 3 Dev SSR, proving its enterprise reliability

➖ Cons

• Larger overhead compared to TSX due to Vite's extensive feature set and plugin system
• Requires familiarity with Vite concepts and configuration for advanced usage scenarios
• May be excessive for simple TypeScript execution tasks where TSX's lightweight approach works better

5. Jiti

Jiti serves as a runtime loader for TypeScript and ESM created by the UnJS team. Where TSX emphasizes execution speed, jiti focuses on compatibility across various module formats, making it particularly valuable for projects mixing CommonJS and ESM dependencies.

🌟 Key features

• Interoperability between ESM and CommonJS modules
• Just-in-time TypeScript and JSX transpilation
• Advanced caching system for improved performance
• Zero-configuration setup with intelligent defaults

➕ Pros

• Handles mixed module environments where TSX might struggle with compatibility issues
• Advanced caching mechanisms improve performance across repeated executions
• Extensive configuration options allow fine-tuning transpilation behavior and module resolution
• Widespread adoption powers major frameworks like Nuxt and tools like Tailwind CSS, proving its reliability

➖ Cons

• Slightly larger bundle size compared to TSX due to its extensive feature set
• Advanced configuration options introduce a learning curve, though basic usage remains straightforward
• Performance may trail TSX for simple, straightforward TypeScript execution scenarios

6. ts-node

ts-node remains the established standard for running TypeScript in Node.js environments. Although TSX has emerged as a faster alternative, ts-node maintains its position through complete type checking and extensive ecosystem support.

🌟 Key features

• Complete TypeScript compilation and type checking
• Extensive configuration options and customization
• Mature ecosystem with wide community adoption
• Integration with testing frameworks and development tools

➕ Pros

• Performs thorough type checking during execution, catching potential issues that TSX might miss
• Extensive configuration options allow fine-tuning TypeScript compilation behavior for specific project needs
• Broad compatibility with testing frameworks, build tools, and development environments
• Years of community contributions have created battle-tested stability

➖ Cons

• Significantly slower execution compared to TSX due to comprehensive type checking and compilation overhead
• Requires more complex configuration for modern ES modules, while TSX handles this automatically

Final thoughts

This guide explored six exciting options beyond TSX, each bringing unique strengths to TypeScript development. Among them, Node.js native support shines as a highly future-ready choice, as it removes the need for external dependencies and delivers great performance through seamless runtime integration.

If you're starting new TypeScript projects, Node.js native support is a perfect fit, offering a smooth, zero-configuration experience without dependencies. If you need more advanced features, you might want to consider other options like Bun or Jiti.

Got an article suggestion? Let us know

Next article

The Top 6 ts-node Alternatives for TypeScript

Explore 6 fast, modern alternatives to ts-node in 2025—Node.js native, TSX, Bun, Deno, vite-node, and Jiti—for better TypeScript execution.

→

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.