NestJS vs Express

When building Node.js backend applications, developers face a choice between structure and flexibility. Express.js provides minimal conventions and maximum freedom to build applications however you choose. NestJS enforces architectural patterns and provides opinionated structure from the start.

Express.js became the de facto Node.js web framework because it stays out of your way. You get HTTP routing, middleware support, and little else. Every architectural decision, from folder organization to error handling, remains your responsibility.

NestJS emerged when Express applications consistently became difficult to maintain as they grew. Teams would start with clean intentions but end up with inconsistent patterns, tangled dependencies, and codebases that new developers couldn't understand quickly.

The choice determines whether you spend time making architectural decisions or implementing business features. Express gives you complete control but requires discipline to maintain consistency. NestJS removes many decisions but constrains how you build applications.

What is Express?

Express represents Node.js minimalism at its core. The framework provides essential web server functionality without imposing structure on your application. You get routing, middleware, and HTTP utilities. Everything else is your choice.

This minimal approach creates complete flexibility:

• No prescribed folder structure - organize code however makes sense to you
• Middleware freedom - choose any authentication, validation, or logging solution
• Database agnostic - integrate with any ORM, query builder, or database driver
• Deployment flexibility - run anywhere Node.js runs

Express applications start simple but complexity grows with requirements. Without built-in patterns, teams develop unique solutions for common problems like validation, authentication, and error handling.

This simplicity appeals to developers who want complete control over their application architecture. Every decision remains explicit and customizable.

What is NestJS?

NestJS applies enterprise software patterns to Node.js development. The framework provides opinionated structure inspired by Angular, making backend applications more predictable and maintainable.

NestJS enforces several key architectural concepts:

• Dependency injection manages component relationships and testing
• Decorators handle routing, validation, and cross-cutting concerns
• Modules organize related functionality into cohesive units
• Guards and interceptors manage authentication and request processing

These patterns create consistency across applications and teams. Instead of inventing solutions for common problems, you follow established conventions that other developers recognize immediately.

NestJS requires understanding dependency injection and decorators before you can build features effectively. This learning curve pays off with maintainable, testable applications that scale across larger teams.

Framework comparison

Understanding how these frameworks approach common development tasks will help you choose the right tool for your project.

Your choice often depends on project complexity and team size. Express works well for simple APIs and experienced teams with strong conventions. NestJS provides structure that helps larger teams build maintainable applications.

Getting started

Let's compare how each framework handles initial project setup and basic API development.

Express gets you running with minimal setup:

mkdir my-api && cd my-api
npm init -y
npm install express

Create a basic server (app.js):

const express = require('express');
const app = express();

app.use(express.json());

app.get('/api/users', (req, res) => {
  const users = [{ id: 1, name: 'John', email: 'john@example.com' }];
  res.json(users);
});

app.post('/api/users', (req, res) => {
  const { name, email } = req.body;
  if (!name || !email) {
    return res.status(400).json({ error: 'Name and email required' });
  }
  res.status(201).json({ id: Date.now(), name, email });
});

app.listen(3000);

This demonstrates Express's minimalist approach. You write straightforward JavaScript functions that handle HTTP requests and responses. The framework provides routing and middleware support but makes no assumptions about how you structure your application logic. Every piece of functionality (validation, error handling, data persistence) requires explicit implementation.

Express applications often start as single files and grow organically. As features accumulate, you'll need to make decisions about separating concerns, organizing routes, and handling shared functionality. The framework gives you complete freedom to architect these solutions, but this freedom requires discipline to maintain consistency as your codebase expands.

Start the server:

node app.js

Express applications start with a single file and grow organically. You make decisions about structure, validation, and error handling as requirements evolve.

NestJS requires more initial setup but provides structure immediately:

npm install -g @nestjs/cli
nest new my-api
cd my-api

The CLI generates a structured project:

src/
├── app.controller.ts    # Main application controller
├── app.module.ts        # Root application module
├── app.service.ts       # Application business logic
└── main.ts             # Application entry point

Generate a users module:

nest generate module users
nest generate controller users
nest generate service users

This creates organized files for your users feature:

src/users/
├── users.controller.ts
├── users.module.ts
└── users.service.ts

Implement the users service (src/users/users.service.ts):

import { Injectable } from '@nestjs/common';

@Injectable()
export class UsersService {
  private users = [{ id: 1, name: 'John', email: 'john@example.com' }];

  findAll() {
    return this.users;
  }

  create(name: string, email: string) {
    const newUser = { id: Date.now(), name, email };
    this.users.push(newUser);
    return newUser;
  }
}

Create the controller (src/users/users.controller.ts):

import { Controller, Get, Post, Body } from '@nestjs/common';
import { UsersService } from './users.service';

@Controller('users')
export class UsersController {
  constructor(private readonly usersService: UsersService) {}

  @Get()
  findAll() {
    return this.usersService.findAll();
  }

  @Post()
  create(@Body() body: { name: string; email: string }) {
    const { name, email } = body;
    return this.usersService.create(name, email);
  }
}

The separation of concerns becomes immediately apparent. Controllers handle HTTP requests but delegate all business logic to services. Services contain the actual functionality but remain unaware of HTTP details. This separation makes testing easier because you can test business logic independently of HTTP handling.

NestJS enforces these patterns through dependency injection. The @Injectable() decorator marks classes as services that can be injected into other components. The constructor injection in the controller automatically provides the UsersService instance. This explicit dependency management makes your application's component relationships clear and testable.

Module organization groups related functionality together. Each feature gets its own module containing controllers, services, and related components. As your application grows, this modular structure prevents different features from becoming entangled and makes it easier to understand how components relate to each other.

Start the development server:

npm run start:dev

NestJS requires understanding modules, controllers, and services before you can build features. This structure provides consistency but increases initial complexity.

Validation and error handling

Both frameworks handle input validation and error management differently, reflecting their design approaches.

Express requires manual validation setup using middleware libraries:

npm install joi

Create validation middleware (middleware/validation.js):

const Joi = require('joi');

const validateUser = (req, res, next) => {
  const schema = Joi.object({
    name: Joi.string().min(2).required(),
    email: Joi.string().email().required(),
  });

  const { error } = schema.validate(req.body);
  if (error) {
    return res.status(400).json({ error: error.details[0].message });
  }
  next();
};

module.exports = { validateUser };

Apply validation to routes:

const { validateUser } = require('./middleware/validation');

app.post('/api/users', validateUser, (req, res) => {
  const { name, email } = req.body;
  res.status(201).json({ id: Date.now(), name, email });
});

Express validation requires choosing and configuring third-party libraries. Popular options include Joi, express-validator, and Yup. Each has different syntax and features, so teams must evaluate and standardize on their preferred approach. The validation logic lives in middleware functions that you compose with your route handlers.

This middleware approach provides flexibility but requires coordination across your application. Different routes might use different validation libraries or patterns unless you establish consistent conventions. Error handling also becomes your responsibility. You need to decide how validation errors should be formatted and returned to clients.

Create a Data Transfer Object (src/users/dto/create-user.dto.ts):

import { IsString, IsEmail, MinLength } from 'class-validator';

export class CreateUserDto {
  @IsString()
  @MinLength(2)
  name: string;

  @IsEmail()
  email: string;
}

Update the controller to use the DTO:

@Controller('users')
export class UsersController {
  @Post()
  create(@Body() createUserDto: CreateUserDto) {
    return this.usersService.create(createUserDto);
  }
}

NestJS integrates validation through class-validator decorators and built-in validation pipes. The decorators provide metadata about validation rules, while pipes automatically validate incoming requests against these rules. This approach eliminates the need to choose between validation libraries. The framework provides a standardized solution.

Data Transfer Objects (DTOs) serve multiple purposes beyond validation. They define the expected structure of incoming data, provide TypeScript type safety, and act as documentation for your API endpoints. When validation fails, NestJS automatically returns properly formatted error responses without requiring custom error handling code.

The validation system works seamlessly with TypeScript, providing compile-time checks for your validation rules. If you reference a property that doesn't exist on your DTO, TypeScript will catch this error during development. This integration between validation, typing, and documentation reduces the cognitive overhead of managing API contracts.

The validation approaches reflect each framework's design. Express requires choosing and configuring validation libraries manually. NestJS provides integrated validation through decorators and built-in pipes.

Database integration

Database integration demonstrates how these frameworks handle data persistence and ORM integration.

Express requires choosing and configuring database libraries manually:

npm install mongoose

Create a user model (models/User.js):

const mongoose = require('mongoose');

const userSchema = new mongoose.Schema({
  name: { type: String, required: true, trim: true },
  email: { type: String, required: true, unique: true },
}, { timestamps: true });

module.exports = mongoose.model('User', userSchema);

Create a users controller (controllers/users.js):

const User = require('../models/User');

const createUser = async (req, res) => {
  try {
    const user = new User(req.body);
    await user.save();
    res.status(201).json(user);
  } catch (error) {
    if (error.code === 11000) {
      return res.status(400).json({ error: 'Email already exists' });
    }
    res.status(500).json({ error: 'Failed to create user' });
  }
};

module.exports = { createUser };

Express database integration requires choosing an ORM or database driver, then configuring it manually. Popular options include Mongoose for MongoDB, Sequelize for SQL databases, or raw database drivers for maximum control. Each choice brings different patterns for defining models, handling relationships, and managing migrations.

The manual configuration extends to error handling and validation. Your application code must handle database-specific errors like duplicate keys, connection failures, and validation errors. This gives you precise control over error responses but requires understanding each database's error patterns and implementing consistent error handling across your application.

Model definitions live in separate files that you import throughout your application. Keeping these models consistent and ensuring proper validation requires discipline, especially as your schema evolves. Database migrations and schema changes become manual processes that you must coordinate carefully.

Create a user schema (src/users/schemas/user.schema.ts):

import { Prop, Schema, SchemaFactory } from '@nestjs/mongoose';
import { Document } from 'mongoose';

@Schema({ timestamps: true })
export class User {
  @Prop({ required: true, trim: true })
  name: string;

  @Prop({ required: true, unique: true })
  email: string;
}

export const UserSchema = SchemaFactory.createForClass(User);

Update the users service to use MongoDB:

@Injectable()
export class UsersService {
  constructor(@InjectModel(User.name) private userModel: Model<User>) {}

  async create(createUserDto: CreateUserDto) {
    const createdUser = new this.userModel(createUserDto);
    return createdUser.save();
  }
}

NestJS database integration happens through modules that encapsulate database configuration and provide consistent patterns across your application. The framework includes modules for popular databases like MongoDB, PostgreSQL, and MySQL, each following similar dependency injection patterns.

Schemas and models integrate with TypeScript to provide compile-time type checking. The decorators used for schema definition serve dual purposes: they configure database constraints and provide metadata for TypeScript type inference. This means your database schema and TypeScript types stay synchronized automatically.

Error handling becomes more predictable because the framework provides consistent exception patterns. Database errors get transformed into HTTP exceptions automatically, and you can customize this behavior through exception filters. The dependency injection system makes testing database interactions straightforward by allowing you to mock database dependencies cleanly.

The database integration patterns show each framework's approach clearly. Express requires manual setup and explicit error handling. NestJS provides integrated modules and dependency injection that handle configuration and error management automatically.

Testing strategies

Testing approaches reveal how these frameworks support code quality and maintainability.

Express requires setting up testing infrastructure manually:

// tests/users.test.js
const request = require('supertest');
const app = require('../app');

describe('Users API', () => {
  it('should create user with valid data', async () => {
    const userData = { name: 'Jane', email: 'jane@example.com' };

    const response = await request(app)
      .post('/api/users')
      .send(userData)
      .expect(201);

    expect(response.body.name).toBe(userData.name);
  });
});

Express testing requires choosing testing frameworks like Jest or Mocha, then configuring test databases and cleanup procedures. You'll need to set up test environments, mock external dependencies, and handle database seeding manually. Popular testing libraries include Supertest for HTTP testing and various assertion libraries for different testing styles.

The testing approach often mirrors your application architecture. If your Express app has inconsistent patterns, your tests will too. Teams need to establish conventions for organizing test files, sharing test utilities, and managing test data. The flexibility that makes Express appealing for development can create challenges for maintaining consistent test practices across larger codebases.

NestJS provides integrated testing utilities:

// src/users/users.service.spec.ts
describe('UsersService', () => {
  let service: UsersService;

  beforeEach(async () => {
    const module = await Test.createTestingModule({
      providers: [UsersService, { provide: getModelToken('User'), useValue: mockUserModel }],
    }).compile();

    service = module.get<UsersService>(UsersService);
  });

  it('should create a user', async () => {
    const userData = { name: 'John', email: 'john@example.com' };
    const result = await service.create(userData);
    expect(result.name).toBe(userData.name);
  });
});

NestJS testing leverages the dependency injection system to make mocking straightforward. The testing module system lets you override dependencies with mocks while keeping the rest of your application structure intact. This makes unit testing services and controllers predictable because you follow the same patterns regardless of which component you're testing.

Integration testing becomes more structured because NestJS applications follow consistent patterns. End-to-end tests use the same module system as your application, making it easier to spin up test environments that accurately reflect production behavior. The framework provides utilities for common testing scenarios, reducing the boilerplate needed to set up comprehensive test suites.

The testing approaches reflect each framework's design patterns. Express requires manual test setup and explicit mocking. NestJS provides integrated testing utilities that work with dependency injection to simplify test configuration.

Which should you choose?

This article covered the key differences between Express and NestJS, showing how each framework approaches Node.js development through different priorities and architectural patterns.

Both frameworks create production-ready Node.js applications, but they optimize for different development scenarios. Express maximizes flexibility and gives you complete control over architectural decisions. NestJS provides structure and patterns that support maintainable development at scale.

Consider starting with Express for simple APIs or when you need complete control over your application structure. Choose NestJS when building complex applications that require consistent patterns and will be maintained by multiple developers over time.

Got an article suggestion? Let us know

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.