Deno vs Bun: TypeScript Development Compared
Trying to select the best runtime for TypeScript development but unsure which platform offers the best developer experience? In the fast-changing JavaScript landscape today, two key runtimes are significantly transforming the way we develop and run TypeScript applications.
Deno emerges as a TypeScript-native runtime that provides built-in type checking, zero-configuration execution, and comprehensive tooling integration.
Bun adopts a performance-focused approach to TypeScript, providing fast transpilation along with support for cutting-edge language features like experimental decorators and advanced path mapping.
This comprehensive guide will help you identify which runtime best supports your TypeScript development workflow and project architecture requirements.
What is Deno?
Deno is a modern JavaScript and TypeScript runtime developed from the ground up by Ryan Dahl, the original creator of Node.js. Released in 2020, it aims to improve on many design choices he wished to revise in Node.js.
The platform focuses on security through explicit permissions, web standards compatibility, and a batteries-included approach that minimizes external dependencies. Deno can run TypeScript code directly without compilation, making it suitable for quick development and deployment.
What is Bun?
Bun is a high-performance JavaScript runtime, bundler, test runner, and package manager built from the ground up for speed. Created by Jarred Sumner and released in 2022, it aims to replace multiple tools in the JavaScript ecosystem with a single, optimized solution.
Built on JavaScriptCore (Safari's engine) rather than V8, Bun achieves exceptional performance while maintaining compatibility with Node.js APIs and npm packages. The runtime includes TypeScript support out of the box and can execute most existing Node.js applications without modifications.
Deno vs Bun: Essential Comparison
The fundamental distinction lies in their design philosophy, ecosystem approach, and target use cases for modern JavaScript development.
Feature | Deno | Bun |
---|---|---|
TypeScript Philosophy | Native execution with built-in type checking | Fast transpilation with external type checking |
Type Checking | Built-in Microsoft TypeScript compiler | Requires external tsc for type checking |
TypeScript Features | Full TypeScript support with zero config | Path mapping, experimental decorators, emit metadata |
JSX/TSX Support | Native .tsx support for React/Preact | Built-in .tsx transpilation without config |
Configuration | Zero-config with sensible defaults | Respects tsconfig.json, especially path mapping |
REPL TypeScript | Full TypeScript REPL with type support | Basic TypeScript execution in REPL |
Type Stripping Method | SWC-based high-performance stripping | Internal transpilation during execution |
npm Package Types | .d.ts files and @ts-types pragma support | Full .d.ts support with Node.js compatibility |
Development Tooling | Integrated formatter, linter, type checker | External tooling required for type checking |
Runtime Performance | Good performance with type checking overhead | Ultra-fast with transpile-only approach |
Package Management | URL imports, no package.json | npm compatibility with faster installation |
Security Model | Explicit permissions for all access | Traditional Node.js security model |
Module System | ESM-only with URL imports | ESM and CommonJS with Node.js compatibility |
Standard Library | Comprehensive built-in standard library | Relies on npm ecosystem and built-in APIs |
Runtime architecture and TypeScript integration
The architectural differences between these runtimes fundamentally shape TypeScript development workflows, from initial project setup to production deployment.
Deno: Integrated TypeScript compiler architecture
Deno embeds Microsoft's TypeScript compiler directly into the runtime, creating a unified execution environment:
// server.ts - Direct TypeScript execution with type checking
interface APIResponse<T> {
data: T;
status: 'success' | 'error';
}
const createResponse = <T>(data: T): APIResponse<T> => ({
data,
status: 'success'
});
serve((req) => {
const response = createResponse({ message: "Hello TypeScript!" });
return new Response(JSON.stringify(response));
});
# Integrated type checking and execution
deno run --allow-net server.ts # Types checked during execution
deno check server.ts # Standalone type checking
This architecture provides compile-time type safety without separate compilation steps, enabling rapid development with guaranteed type correctness.
Bun: Fast transpilation with external type validation
Bun prioritizes TypeScript execution speed through optimized transpilation while delegating type checking to external tools:
// app.ts - Advanced TypeScript features
import { config } from "@/config"; // Path mapping support
@Injectable()
class UserService {
async getUser(id: number): Promise<User> {
return await this.db.user.findById(id);
}
}
# Separated execution and type checking
bun run app.ts # Fast execution without type checking
bunx tsc --noEmit # External type validation
This separation allows developers to optimize for runtime performance while maintaining comprehensive type safety through dedicated TypeScript tooling.
TypeScript development experience deep dive
Both runtimes offer compelling TypeScript support but with fundamentally different approaches to type checking, tooling integration, and developer workflow optimization.
Deno: Complete TypeScript integration with built-in type checking
Deno provides comprehensive TypeScript support through its integrated toolchain, combining execution with real-time type checking:
// api.ts - Full type checking and execution
interface User {
id: number;
name: string;
email: string;
}
export async function createUser(userData: Omit<User, 'id'>): Promise<User> {
const user: User = { id: Date.now(), ...userData };
return user;
}
# Complete TypeScript workflow
deno run --allow-net api.ts # Execute with type stripping
deno check api.ts # Built-in type checking
deno check --all # Check including npm packages
deno fmt api.ts # Format TypeScript
deno lint api.ts # Lint TypeScript code
Deno's approach eliminates configuration complexity through sensible defaults while providing comprehensive type checking capabilities. The integrated LSP provides immediate feedback in editors without additional setup.
Bun: Ultra-fast TypeScript with advanced language features
Bun focuses on maximum TypeScript execution speed while supporting advanced language features that many other runtimes lack:
// advanced.ts - Path mapping and decorators
import { config } from "config"; // Resolved via tsconfig paths
import "reflect-metadata";
function Injectable(target: Function) {
const params = Reflect.getMetadata("design:paramtypes", target);
console.log("Dependencies:", params);
}
@Injectable
class UserService {
constructor(private config: typeof config) {}
}
// tsconfig.json - Advanced TypeScript features
{
"compilerOptions": {
"baseUrl": "./src",
"paths": {
"config": ["./config.ts"]
},
"experimentalDecorators": true,
"emitDecoratorMetadata": true
}
}
# Fast TypeScript execution with advanced features
bun run advanced.ts # Instant execution with path mapping
bun run --hot server.ts # Hot reloading during development
bunx tsc --noEmit # External type checking when needed
Bun's TypeScript support prioritizes execution speed and compatibility with existing Node.js TypeScript projects, including full support for complex tsconfig.json configurations.
Type checking approaches
The fundamental difference lies in their type checking philosophy:
# Deno: Built-in type checking
deno check main.ts # Fast built-in TypeScript compiler
deno check jsr:@std/http # Remote module type checking
deno check --doc # Documentation type checking
# Bun: External type checking for accuracy
bun run main.ts # Fast execution without type checking
bunx tsc --noEmit # Separate type checking step
bunx tsc --watch --noEmit # Watch mode type checking
Deno integrates type checking into the development workflow, while Bun separates execution performance from type safety validation.
REPL and interactive TypeScript development
Both provide interactive TypeScript environments with different capabilities:
# Deno REPL with full TypeScript support
deno
> const sum = (a: number, b: number): number => a + b;
> sum(5, 10) # Full type checking and IntelliSense
15
# Bun REPL with fast TypeScript execution
bun repl
> const user: { name: string; age: number } = { name: "John", age: 30 };
> user.name # Fast execution, basic TypeScript support
"John"
Deno's REPL provides comprehensive TypeScript language services, while Bun's focuses on fast execution with basic TypeScript syntax support.
Package management and TypeScript dependencies
The approaches to dependency management reflect different philosophies about TypeScript ecosystem integration and type safety.
Deno: Simple URL-based imports with TypeScript
Deno eliminates package management complexity through direct URL imports with full TypeScript support:
// deps.ts - TypeScript dependencies via URLs
export { serve } from "https://deno.land/std@0.208.0/http/server.ts";
export { assertEquals } from "https://deno.land/std@0.208.0/testing/asserts.ts";
// External npm packages with types
// @ts-types="npm:@types/express"
import express from "npm:express";
# No package installation - direct execution
deno run --allow-net server.ts
deno cache deps.ts # Cache for offline use
deno info # Show dependency graph
Bun: npm ecosystem with TypeScript optimizations
Bun provides full npm compatibility while optimizing TypeScript-specific workflows:
{
"dependencies": {
"express": "^4.18.2",
"@types/express": "^4.17.20"
},
"devDependencies": {
"typescript": "^5.3.0"
}
}
# TypeScript-aware package management
bun install # Ultra-fast with .d.ts resolution
bun add express @types/express # Automatic type package detection
bun run tsc # TypeScript compilation when needed
Final thoughts
After comparing both runtimes' TypeScript capabilities, Bun is the better choice for most TypeScript projects.
Bun's faster execution, advanced TypeScript features (decorators, path mapping, emit metadata), and Node.js ecosystem compatibility outweigh Deno's integrated type checking.
The separation of execution from type validation allows you to optimize for speed while maintaining type safety through external tools when needed.