Litestar vs FastAPI

Python API development today offers two compelling but contrasting paths with FastAPI's comprehensive tooling versus Litestar's performance focus.

FastAPI has become the go-to choice for Python API development since 2018. With its automatic documentation generation, excellent developer experience, and massive ecosystem, it powers APIs at companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Microsoft.

Litestar takes a performance-first approach while maintaining developer productivity. Built for speed with msgspec integration and minimal overhead, it offers enterprise-grade features without sacrificing performance.

This comprehensive guide examines their core differences, performance characteristics, and ideal use cases to help you choose the right framework for your project.

What Is FastAPI?

FastAPI revolutionized Python web development by combining high performance with exceptional developer experience. Created by Sebastián Ramirez, it has grown into the most popular async Python framework.

FastAPI's strength lies in its automatic features. It generates interactive API documentation, validates request data, and provides detailed error responses - all using Python type hints. The framework handles the complex parts of API development, letting developers focus on business logic.

The ecosystem around FastAPI is massive. From authentication libraries to database integrations, there's usually a well-maintained package for any need. The recent FastAPI CLI makes getting started even easier with simple commands like fastapi dev for development and fastapi run for production.

What Is Litestar?

Litestar represents a modern approach to high-performance APIs. Originally known as Starlite, it focuses on delivering maximum speed while maintaining clean, readable code.

Built on msgspec for serialization and designed with minimal overhead, Litestar consistently outperforms other Python frameworks in benchmarks. It enforces strict typing, catches errors early, and provides enterprise features like dependency injection, middleware, and automatic OpenAPI generation.

Litestar strikes a balance between performance and developer experience. Unlike micro-frameworks that require extensive setup, Litestar provides batteries-included functionality while remaining lightweight and fast.

Litestar vs FastAPI: quick comparison

The choice between these frameworks shapes your entire development approach and application architecture. Each represents different priorities in the speed-versus-convenience spectrum.

Application architecture

The fundamental difference between Litestar and FastAPI lies in their architectural philosophy and how they handle application structure and data flow.

FastAPI embraces convention over configuration, providing sensible defaults and automatic behavior that works for most use cases:

# FastAPI - Automatic documentation and validation
from fastapi import FastAPI
from pydantic import BaseModel

class User(BaseModel):
    id: int
    name: str
    email: str

app = FastAPI()

@app.get("/users/{user_id}")
async def get_user(user_id: int):
    return await fetch_user_from_db(user_id)

FastAPI automatically generates OpenAPI documentation, validates input data, and handles serialization. The framework makes architectural decisions for you, focusing on rapid development.

Litestar takes a more explicit approach, giving developers control over how their application is structured while providing powerful tools:

# Litestar - Explicit control with performance focus
from litestar import Litestar, get
import msgspec

class User(msgspec.Struct):
    id: int
    name: str
    email: str

@get("/users/{user_id:int}")
async def get_user(user_id: int) -> User:
    user = await fetch_user_from_db(user_id)
    return User(**user)

app = Litestar(route_handlers=[get_user])

Litestar's server-centric approach eliminates client-side state synchronization challenges while maintaining responsive user experiences through targeted DOM updates.

Performance characteristics

Performance differences between these frameworks are significant and should influence your choice based on application requirements.

FastAPI delivers solid performance suitable for most applications, with optimization opportunities through careful implementation:

# FastAPI - Optimized for better performance
from fastapi import FastAPI, BackgroundTasks
from fastapi.responses import ORJSONResponse

app = FastAPI(default_response_class=ORJSONResponse)

@app.get("/compute/{data}")
async def compute_endpoint(data: str):
    result = expensive_computation(data)
    return {"result": result}

@app.post("/process-async")
async def process_async(data: dict, background_tasks: BackgroundTasks):
    background_tasks.add_task(heavy_background_work, data)
    return {"status": "processing"}

Litestar consistently outperforms FastAPI in benchmarks, often handling requests more efficiently, especially under heavy loads. The performance advantage comes from its architecture:

# Litestar - Built for maximum performance
from litestar import Litestar, get
import msgspec

class DataModel(msgspec.Struct):
    value: str
    count: int

@get("/fast-endpoint")
async def fast_computation() -> DataModel:
    # msgspec serialization is significantly faster
    result = await perform_computation()
    return DataModel(value=result.value, count=result.count)

app = Litestar(route_handlers=[fast_computation])

In benchmarks, msgspec is ~12x faster than Pydantic V2 and ~85x faster than Pydantic V1, making Litestar the clear choice for performance-critical applications.

Data validation and serialization

The approach to data handling represents the biggest philosophical difference between these frameworks.

FastAPI uses Pydantic for comprehensive data validation with extensive features and excellent error messages:

# FastAPI - Rich validation with Pydantic
from fastapi import FastAPI
from pydantic import BaseModel, Field, EmailStr

class CreateUserRequest(BaseModel):
    name: str = Field(min_length=2, max_length=100)
    email: EmailStr
    age: int = Field(ge=13, le=120)

app = FastAPI()

@app.post("/users/")
async def create_user(user_data: CreateUserRequest):
    # Pydantic automatically validates and provides detailed errors
    user = await create_user_in_db(user_data.dict())
    return {"message": "User created", "user_id": user.id}

Pydantic provides detailed validation, custom validators, and automatic documentation generation. Error messages are user-friendly and specify exactly what went wrong.

Litestar uses msgspec for validation, which performs validation during decoding rather than as a separate step, making it significantly faster:

# Litestar - Fast validation with msgspec
from litestar import Litestar, post
import msgspec

class CreateUserRequest(msgspec.Struct):
    name: str
    email: str
    age: int

    def __post_init__(self):
        if not (2 <= len(self.name) <= 100):
            raise ValueError("Name must be 2-100 characters")
        if not (13 <= self.age <= 120):
            raise ValueError("Age must be between 13 and 120")

@post("/users/")
async def create_user(data: CreateUserRequest) -> dict:
    user = await create_user_in_db(data)
    return {"message": "User created", "user_id": user.id}

app = Litestar(route_handlers=[create_user])

msgspec validation is faster but requires more manual work for complex validation scenarios. The trade-off is significantly better performance for high-throughput applications.

Developer experience

The day-to-day development experience varies significantly, affecting productivity, debugging, and long-term maintenance.

FastAPI provides excellent tooling and comprehensive documentation:

# FastAPI - Rich development experience
from fastapi import FastAPI, Depends
from fastapi.security import OAuth2PasswordBearer

app = FastAPI(title="My API", version="1.0.0")
oauth2_scheme = OAuth2PasswordBearer(tokenUrl="token")

async def get_current_user(token: str = Depends(oauth2_scheme)):
    user = await verify_token(token)
    return user

@app.get("/protected-data")
async def get_protected_data(current_user = Depends(get_current_user)):
    return {"data": "secret", "user": current_user.name}

FastAPI's automatic documentation at /docs and /redoc makes API exploration effortless. The framework integrates seamlessly with IDEs, providing excellent autocomplete and error detection.

Litestar offers powerful features with explicit control:

# Litestar - Explicit but powerful development
from litestar import Litestar, get
from litestar.di import Provide

async def get_current_user(token: str) -> User:
    return await verify_token(token)

@get("/protected-data")
async def get_protected_data(user: User) -> dict:
    return {"data": "secret", "user": user.name}

app = Litestar(
    route_handlers=[get_protected_data],
    dependencies={"user": Provide(get_current_user)}
)

Litestar's maintainers keep a high bar for code quality and maintain great community culture, providing excellent support for developers learning the framework.

Dependency injection

How frameworks handle dependencies significantly impacts application architecture and testability.

FastAPI uses function-based dependency injection that's intuitive for most Python developers:

# FastAPI - Function-based dependencies
from fastapi import FastAPI, Depends

app = FastAPI()

async def get_database():
    return DatabaseService()

async def get_user_service(db = Depends(get_database)):
    return UserService(db)

@app.get("/profile")
async def get_profile(user_service = Depends(get_user_service)):
    return await user_service.get_profile()

FastAPI's dependency system is straightforward but can become verbose with complex dependency chains.

Litestar has a dependency injection system inspired by pytest, offering more powerful features:

# Litestar - Powerful DI system
from litestar import Litestar, get
from litestar.di import Provide

async def database_dependency() -> DatabaseService:
    return DatabaseService()

async def user_service_dependency(db: DatabaseService) -> UserService:
    return UserService(db)

@get("/profile")
async def get_profile(user_service: UserService) -> dict:
    return await user_service.get_profile()

app = Litestar(
    route_handlers=[get_profile],
    dependencies={
        "db": Provide(database_dependency),
        "user_service": Provide(user_service_dependency)
    }
)

Litestar's DI system allows dependency override at any level and provides cleaner separation between dependency definition and usage.

Ecosystem and community

The surrounding ecosystem significantly impacts long-term project success and development velocity.

FastAPI has over 80,000 stars on GitHub and a large, established ecosystem:

# FastAPI - Rich ecosystem
from fastapi import FastAPI
from fastapi_users import FastAPIUsers
from fastapi_cache import FastAPICache

app = FastAPI()

# Easy integration with third-party packages
users = FastAPIUsers(get_user_manager, [auth_backend])
app.include_router(users.get_auth_router(auth_backend))

# Monitoring and caching
FastAPICache.init(RedisBackend())

FastAPI's ecosystem includes solutions for authentication, caching, monitoring, database integration, and virtually every other web development need.

Litestar has around 5,900 stars on GitHub but is growing steadily with high-quality, built-in features:

# Litestar - Built-in enterprise features
from litestar import Litestar
from litestar.contrib.sqlalchemy import SQLAlchemyPlugin
from litestar.middleware import RateLimitMiddleware
from litestar.security.jwt import JWTAuth

# Built-in authentication and middleware
jwt_auth = JWTAuth[User](
    retrieve_user_handler=get_user_from_token,
    token_secret="your-secret-key"
)

app = Litestar(
    route_handlers=[protected_route],
    middleware=[RateLimitMiddleware(rate_limit=("minute", 60))],
    plugins=[SQLAlchemyPlugin(config=db_config)],
    on_app_init=[jwt_auth.on_app_init]
)

While Litestar's ecosystem is smaller, it provides enterprise-grade features out of the box without requiring external dependencies.

Final thoughts

This article compared two leading Python API frameworks, each optimized for different development priorities.

FastAPI excels in developer productivity through automated documentation, extensive third-party integrations, and intuitive design patterns. Teams can ship production APIs rapidly with minimal configuration overhead.

Litestar prioritizes raw performance using msgspec serialization and lean architecture. Applications requiring high throughput gain measurable speed improvements while retaining enterprise-grade functionality.

We hope you've been able to make a choice between these frameworks based on your project's specific needs and constraints.

Got an article suggestion? Let us know

Next article

Top 10 Django Alternatives for Web Development

Top 10 Django alternatives: FastAPI, Flask, Rails, Laravel, Phoenix & more. Compare features, performance & use cases.

→

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.