Top 6 Free MongoDB Alternatives in 2025

MongoDB is a popular NoSQL database known for its flexibility, scalability, and document-based design. It handles unstructured and semi-structured data well using its JSON-like BSON format. However, it also has limits such as weaker multi-document transactions, high memory use, limited joins, and a 16 MB document size cap.

This article highlights six of the best free MongoDB alternatives and ranks them by query flexibility, scalability, data model support, and overall value for different types of applications.

MongoDB features

MongoDB shines with its flexible schema design that allows storing different document structures in the same collection. It provides excellent horizontal scalability through automatic sharding, strong indexing capabilities, and a powerful aggregation framework. MongoDB supports replica sets for high availability and offers rich query capabilities for document-oriented data. Its integration with popular programming languages and frameworks makes it a go-to choice for rapid application development.

The top 6 free MongoDB alternatives in 2025

Before exploring each database in detail, here's how they compare across essential capabilities:

1. PostgreSQL with JSONB

PostgreSQL with its JSONB extension provides the best of both worlds: robust relational database capabilities combined with flexible document storage. PostgreSQL 18, released on September 25, 2025, brought significant performance improvements including asynchronous I/O. This makes it a compelling MongoDB alternative for applications that need both structured and semi-structured data.

🌟 Key features

• JSONB data type for efficient JSON document storage and indexing
• Full ACID transactions across multiple documents and tables
• Advanced SQL support with joins, CTEs, and window functions
• PostgreSQL 18's asynchronous I/O using io_uring on Linux
• Mature replication and high availability features
• Rich extension ecosystem including PostGIS and TimescaleDB

➕ Pros

• Full ACID transactions across any number of documents and collections, unlike MongoDB's limited multi-document transaction support
• Native support for complex joins that MongoDB struggles with, eliminating the need for manual data denormalization
• JSONB indexing provides query performance comparable to MongoDB while supporting full SQL capabilities
• PostgreSQL 18's io_uring support delivers up to 3× performance improvements for I/O-heavy workloads
• No 16 MB document size limit like MongoDB, JSONB documents can be much larger
• Lower storage overhead than MongoDB because field names aren't duplicated in every document
• Mature tools for backup, monitoring, and administration built over decades

➖ Cons

• Horizontal write scaling requires more setup than MongoDB's automatic sharding
• Schema migrations can be more involved than MongoDB's schemaless approach
• Requires more initial configuration and tuning than MongoDB's simpler defaults
• JSONB queries use different syntax than MongoDB's query language, requiring code changes

2. Apache Cassandra

Apache Cassandra excels at handling massive amounts of data across multiple data centers with no single point of failure. Originally developed at Facebook, Cassandra provides linear scalability and proven fault tolerance that makes it ideal for applications requiring always-on availability at global scale.

🌟 Key features

• Wide-column store optimized for write-heavy workloads
• Linear scalability by adding nodes without downtime
• Multi-datacenter replication with tunable consistency
• No single point of failure in the architecture
• CQL (Cassandra Query Language) similar to SQL

➕ Pros

• Handles write-heavy workloads better than MongoDB with optimized write paths and no master bottleneck
• Every node in the cluster is equal, eliminating MongoDB's primary/secondary architecture complexity
• Linear scalability means adding nodes proportionally increases capacity and throughput
• Tunable consistency per query allows choosing between strong and eventual consistency based on requirements
• Proven at massive scale by companies like Netflix, Apple, and Instagram handling trillions of requests
• Data automatically replicates across data centers for geographic distribution

➖ Cons

• CQL is more limited than MongoDB's query language, lacking features like full-text search and complex aggregations
• No native support for joins or transactions across partitions, similar to MongoDB but more restrictive
• Requires careful data modeling upfront since changing partition keys is difficult
• Higher operational complexity than MongoDB for managing and tuning clusters
• Eventual consistency model can be confusing for developers accustomed to MongoDB's stronger guarantees

3. CouchDB

Apache CouchDB takes an offline-first approach with its unique master-master replication protocol. It stores documents in JSON format and uses HTTP as its API, making it exceptionally well-suited for distributed systems and mobile applications where MongoDB's connection requirements would be problematic.

🌟 Key features

• Document-oriented database with JSON storage
• Master-master replication allowing writes to any node
• Built-in HTTP API and web server
• Offline-first design with PouchDB integration
• Automatic conflict detection and resolution
• MapReduce for views and queries

➕ Pros

• Master-master replication eliminates MongoDB's single primary bottleneck, allowing any node to accept writes
• No document size limit unlike MongoDB's 16 MB restriction, enabling storage of arbitrarily large documents
• Built-in HTTP server serves static files and web apps directly from the database
• PouchDB provides seamless offline sync for web and mobile apps with automatic synchronization when connectivity returns
• Automatic conflict resolution handles multi-master write conflicts that would require manual resolution in MongoDB
• RESTful HTTP API makes integration simple without special drivers

➖ Cons

• Append-only storage model can struggle with high-frequency writes compared to MongoDB's in-place updates
• MapReduce views are less intuitive and powerful than MongoDB's aggregation pipeline
• Smaller ecosystem of tools, drivers, and community resources than MongoDB
• Query performance generally slower than MongoDB for complex operations
• Limited commercial support options compared to MongoDB's extensive enterprise offerings

4. Amazon DynamoDB

Amazon DynamoDB is AWS's fully managed NoSQL database service that handles more than 10 trillion requests per day. For applications already running on AWS, DynamoDB provides seamless integration with other AWS services and eliminates the operational overhead that MongoDB requires.

🌟 Key features

• Fully managed serverless database with auto-scaling
• Single-digit millisecond latency at any scale
• Key-value and document data models
• Global tables for multi-region replication
• DynamoDB Streams for change data capture
• Pay-per-request or provisioned capacity pricing

➕ Pros

• Fully managed service eliminates the server maintenance, patching, and monitoring that MongoDB requires
• Seamless AWS integration with Lambda, S3, CloudWatch, and other services without leaving the AWS ecosystem
• Auto-scaling handles traffic spikes automatically without the capacity planning MongoDB deployments need
• Global tables provide multi-region active-active replication with sub-second synchronization
• Pay-per-request pricing (reduced in November 2024) can be more cost-effective than MongoDB hosting for variable workloads
• Handles peaks of 20 million requests per second, far exceeding typical MongoDB deployments

➖ Cons

• Query flexibility limited to primary keys and secondary indexes unlike MongoDB's rich query language
• 400 KB item size limit is much smaller than MongoDB's 16 MB document limit
• AWS vendor lock-in makes migration to other platforms difficult
• Complex queries require additional services like Elasticsearch unlike MongoDB's built-in capabilities
• Costs can escalate quickly for consistently high traffic, requiring careful capacity planning
• No support for aggregations or complex operations that MongoDB handles natively

5. Redis

Redis is an in-memory data structure store that provides sub-millisecond latency for the most demanding applications. While primarily known as a cache, Redis supports multiple data structures and persistence options that make it viable as a primary database for specific use cases where MongoDB's disk-based approach is too slow.

🌟 Key features

• In-memory storage for microsecond-level latency
• Support for multiple data structures (strings, lists, sets, sorted sets, hashes, bitmaps)
• Optional persistence with RDB snapshots and AOF logging
• Pub/sub messaging capabilities
• Redis Modules extending functionality (RedisJSON, RediSearch, RedisGraph)
• Cluster mode for horizontal scaling

➕ Pros

• Orders of magnitude faster than MongoDB for operations that fit in memory with sub-millisecond latency
• RedisJSON module provides JSON document storage with JSONPath queries similar to MongoDB
• Built-in pub/sub eliminates the need for separate message queues that MongoDB deployments often require
• Multiple data structures provide flexibility beyond MongoDB's document model for specific use cases
• Active-active geo-replication distributes data globally with conflict resolution
• Lower operational complexity than MongoDB for caching and session storage use cases

➖ Cons

• Memory-bound storage is expensive at scale compared to MongoDB's disk-based approach
• Persistence options less mature than MongoDB's durability guarantees
• Cluster mode more complex to set up and manage than MongoDB's replica sets
• Not suitable for datasets larger than available RAM unless using disk-backed modes
• Limited query capabilities compared to MongoDB's aggregation framework
• Redis Stack (formerly Redis Enterprise) uses a source-available license rather than truly open source

6. Couchbase

Couchbase combines the best of document databases and key-value stores with SQL-like querying through N1QL (now SQL++). Couchbase Server 8.0, released in October 2025, introduced Hyperscale Vector Indexing for AI workloads and enhanced security features, making it a compelling MongoDB alternative for enterprises requiring both flexibility and performance.

🌟 Key features

• Document and key-value data models in one platform
• SQL++ query language (formerly N1QL) with full SQL capabilities
• Built-in full-text search without external dependencies
• Couchbase 8.0's Hyperscale Vector Indexing for AI applications
• Mobile sync with Couchbase Lite for offline-first apps
• Memory-first architecture with automatic caching

➕ Pros

• SQL++ provides familiar SQL syntax with JOIN support, eliminating MongoDB's $lookup performance issues
• Memory-first architecture delivers sub-millisecond latency for cached data, faster than MongoDB's disk-based approach
• Built-in full-text search removes the need for Elasticsearch that MongoDB deployments typically require
• Couchbase Mobile enables true offline-first applications with automatic sync, superior to MongoDB Realm
• Hyperscale Vector Indexing (8.0) handles billions of vectors with millisecond latency for AI workloads
• ACID transactions across multiple documents without MongoDB's limitations
• Cross-datacenter replication (XDCR) provides active-active deployments across regions

➖ Cons

• Enterprise Edition required for production features, with higher costs than MongoDB Community Edition
• Community Edition limited to 5 nodes and 4 cores per node
• Smaller ecosystem and community than MongoDB means fewer third-party integrations
• Learning curve for SQL++ despite similarity to SQL
• More complex to deploy and manage than MongoDB's simpler architecture
• Limited to Apache 2.0 for Community Edition with significant feature restrictions

Final thoughts

The best MongoDB alternative depends on what you need. PostgreSQL with JSONB gives you strong transactions, complex queries, and flexible documents in one system. Cassandra is best for huge, write-heavy workloads that scale globally.

If you use AWS, DynamoDB is easy to manage and integrates well, but has simpler queries. Redis is the fastest option when all data can stay in memory. CouchDB works great for offline-first and mobile apps.

Couchbase offers SQL-like queries, full-text search, and mobile sync in one platform, and is strong for AI and high-performance use cases. For complex joins, strong consistency, and open-source licensing, PostgreSQL with JSONB is usually the top choice.

Got an article suggestion? Let us know

Next article

SQL vs NoSQL: Understanding Database Paradigms

Learn the difference between SQL and NoSQL databases, their strengths, and when to use each. Understand structure vs flexibility and how modern apps combine both.

→

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.