At first glance, New Relic and Graylog might seem like competing platforms, but they're built for very different jobs. New Relic is a full-stack observability platform where log management is one part of a much broader product that also includes APM, infrastructure monitoring, tracing, digital experience monitoring, and AI-powered operations. Graylog, on the other hand, is focused on log management and security operations. That's what it was built for, and that's still where it excels.
Because of that, this comparison isn't really about choosing between two products that solve the same problem. It's about deciding whether a dedicated logging platform makes sense alongside, or instead of, a full observability platform. Many engineering teams already use New Relic for monitoring applications and infrastructure but wonder if a specialized logging solution could provide better search, lower costs, or stronger security capabilities.
The question is slightly different for security teams. If you're evaluating Graylog as an alternative to platforms like Splunk, New Relic isn't trying to compete on the same terms. While it includes log management and security features, its goal is to help engineering teams understand and troubleshoot production systems, not to serve as a dedicated SIEM and log analytics platform.
In this comparison, we'll look at where the two platforms overlap, where they don't, and which one makes the most sense depending on whether your priority is observability, log management, or security operations.
| Feature | New Relic | Graylog |
|---|---|---|
| Primary purpose | Full-stack observability platform | Log management and SIEM |
| Deployment model | SaaS only | Self-hosted (Open/Enterprise/Security), Graylog Cloud, or hybrid |
| Free tier | Yes (100GB/month + 1 full platform user, forever) | Yes (Graylog Open, unlimited self-hosted ingestion) |
| Pricing model | Per-user + data ingest (GB) | Free (self-hosted) or fixed annual license (Enterprise/Security) |
| Starting paid price | $10 first user + $99/user (Standard) | $15,000/yr (Enterprise) or $18,000/yr (Security) |
| APM / distributed tracing | Yes (primary strength) | No |
| Infrastructure monitoring | Yes | No |
| Log management | Yes (all logs searchable, $0.40/GB) | Yes (core product) |
| Digital experience monitoring | Yes (browser + mobile RUM) | No |
| SIEM / threat detection | Limited (Security RX in preview) | Yes (Graylog Security: Sigma rules, MITRE ATT&CK, UEBA) |
| AI investigation | Yes (SRE Agent, Preview Feb 2026) | Limited (explainable AI for parsing/enrichment) |
| MCP server | Yes (Preview, Agentic Platform) | No |
| Self-hosted option | No | Yes (Open and Enterprise) |
| Vendor lock-in risk | Moderate (NRQL, SaaS-only) | Low (open-source core, OpenSearch backend) |
| Underlying search backend | NRDB (proprietary) | OpenSearch/Elasticsearch |
| Compliance content packs | Limited | Yes (Enterprise: GDPR, HIPAA, SOX) |
| SOC 2 Type II | Yes | Varies by deployment |
| FedRAMP | Yes (Moderate, expanding to High) | No |
Picture two different conversations happening at two different companies. At the first, an engineering lead is renewing New Relic and notices the log ingest line item has crept up to a third of the total bill. They google "New Relic logging alternative" and Graylog shows up. At the second, a security analyst is three months into a Splunk renewal negotiation that's gone nowhere good, and someone on the team mentions they used Graylog at a previous job. Neither of these people set out to compare a $349-a-month-per-seat observability platform against a tool that's free to self-host. They both ended up here because logs sit at the intersection of two different buying motions: "I need to see what my system is doing" and "I need to detect when something bad is happening to it."
New Relic answers the first motion comprehensively and the second one barely. Graylog answers the second motion well and doesn't attempt the first at all. That asymmetry is worth keeping in view through everything below, because a feature-by-feature scorecard would make Graylog look like it's losing a contest it never entered.
New Relic's logs live inside NRDB alongside every other signal the platform collects, queryable through the same NRQL you'd use for a trace or an infrastructure metric. That's genuinely useful when you're mid-incident and want to pivot from a slow trace into the logs from the same request without switching tools. It's also why New Relic can't easily be "just" a logging tool: the pricing, the seat model, the whole platform is built around that cross-signal correlation, so paying for logs alone still means paying for the infrastructure that makes correlation possible.
Graylog runs on three components, a server handling ingestion and the UI, MongoDB for metadata, and OpenSearch doing the actual indexing, none of which is proprietary. You can self-host the whole stack for free with no ingestion cap, which is the part of Graylog's pitch that actually matters: there's no vendor controlling your exit, because the backend is an open standard you could migrate off if you ever needed to. What you're trading for that freedom is operational ownership. Someone on your team is now responsible for OpenSearch cluster health and MongoDB upkeep, work New Relic's SaaS model removes entirely.
| Architectural factor | New Relic | Graylog |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Full observability (APM, infra, logs, DEM) | Log management and SIEM |
| Data storage | New Relic-hosted (NRDB) | Your infrastructure (self-hosted) or Graylog Cloud |
| Storage backend | Proprietary | OpenSearch / Elasticsearch (open standard) |
| Self-hosted option | No | Yes (Open, Enterprise) |
| Operational overhead | None (fully managed SaaS) | Yours, if self-hosted |
| Vendor lock-in | Moderate (NRQL, SaaS-only) | Low (open backend, no forced cloud) |
Logs and security alerts are only half the job. Someone still has to get woken up at 3am, and neither platform has a real answer for that. Better Stack handles the on-call scheduling, phone and SMS escalation, and incident timeline that both of these tools assume you'll source elsewhere.
From heartbeat monitoring to incident timelines to status pages, one platform for the whole reliability lifecycle. Start free.
100GB a month, free, forever. That's New Relic's logging tier before anything starts costing money, and it's a genuinely generous starting point. Beyond it, every byte you send is searchable through NRQL with no separate indexing decision and no archive tier hiding data you forgot to pay extra for, at $0.40/GB. The simplicity is real: there's exactly one number to model, pattern detection clusters repetitive lines automatically, and AI summarization hands you a hypothesis before you've finished opening the dashboard.
Graylog's number is different in kind, not just size: zero, if you're willing to run the infrastructure yourself. Streams and pipelines route, parse, and enrich data on the way in, and selective ingestion with intelligent tiering lets you decide which data actually counts against a paid license and which gets routed to cheap cold storage, a cost lever New Relic's flat per-GB rate simply doesn't give you. The catch lives in the free tier specifically: Graylog Open has no built-in alerting or correlation engine at all, which means the free version is genuinely good for searching logs and genuinely unsuited to being your production alerting system. That gap is most of why teams end up paying for Enterprise even when ingestion costs alone wouldn't have forced the upgrade.
So the actual comparison isn't "which platform searches logs better." Both do this competently. It's "would you rather pay a predictable per-GB rate to a vendor, or pay nothing for the software and instead pay your own engineers to keep OpenSearch healthy." Neither answer is wrong, but they're answers to different constraints, budget versus headcount, and most teams already know which one they're short on.
| Log management | New Relic | Graylog |
|---|---|---|
| Billing model | $0.40/GB ingest (100GB/month free) | Free (self-hosted, unlimited) or fixed annual license |
| All logs searchable | Yes | Yes |
| Data tiering for cost control | No (flat per-GB) | Yes (selective ingestion, intelligent tiering) |
| Alerting/correlation in free tier | N/A | No (Open tier lacks this entirely) |
| Data location | New Relic-hosted | Your infrastructure or Graylog Cloud |
| Retention | Up to 7 years, no rehydration | Configurable (your storage) |
It's worth pulling security out as its own conversation rather than folding it into a feature table, because this is the one place where calling this a fair comparison would actually be misleading in the other direction.
New Relic doesn't have a SIEM. Security RX, previewed in 2026, correlates vulnerability findings with engineering context, which is a useful feature for an APM platform to have, but it's not Sigma rules, it's not MITRE ATT&CK alignment, and it's not built for a SOC analyst's actual workflow. New Relic's broader compliance posture (SOC 2, HIPAA on Data Plus, FedRAMP Moderate expanding toward High) is solid, but that's certification, not threat detection.
Graylog Security supports Sigma rules, which means detection logic written once is portable rather than locked to one vendor's syntax. Detections map to MITRE ATT&CK. UEBA flags anomalous user and entity behavior. Risk-based alerting scores findings by entity rather than dumping raw alert volume on an analyst, and guided incident response walks someone from alert to context to resolution in fewer clicks.
That $3,000/year gap between Graylog Enterprise and Graylog Security buys exactly this, and for a security team that's been quietly dreading their Splunk renewal, it's a real alternative worth a genuine bake-off rather than a footnote in a vendor comparison. New Relic isn't a competitor here. It's just not in this race.
| Security and compliance | New Relic | Graylog |
|---|---|---|
| Dedicated SIEM product | No (Security RX, preview) | Yes (Graylog Security) |
| Sigma rule support | No | Yes |
| MITRE ATT&CK alignment | No | Yes |
| UEBA | No | Yes |
| Compliance content packs | Limited | Yes (Enterprise: GDPR, HIPAA, SOX) |
| FedRAMP | Yes (Moderate, expanding to High) | No |
Neither platform actually finishes the job here, and the way they fall short is nearly identical, so this section can move quickly.
New Relic's Applied Intelligence groups related alerts and offers an AI-generated summary before you've opened a dashboard.
Graylog's event definitions correlate across multiple streams, and the Security edition adds entity-based risk scoring on top.
Both platforms are competent at deciding something is wrong and explaining why. Neither one can pick up a phone. No on-call rotation builder, no SMS escalation, in either product. Teams on both sides end up wiring in PagerDuty or OpsGenie, adding $245 to $415 a month for a five-person rotation regardless of which platform's alerts are triggering the page.
| Alerting and response | New Relic | Graylog |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-source correlation | Yes (Applied Intelligence) | Yes (event definitions) |
| Risk-based/entity scoring | No | Yes (Security tier) |
| On-call scheduling | No (external tools) | No (external tools) |
New Relic's SRE Agent, launched February 2026, runs full-stack diagnostics during incidents against an entity topology graph, and the Agentic Platform around it adds a no-code agent builder and MCP support. It's genuinely the more ambitious roadmap of the two. It's also still labeled Preview as of this writing, which means the gap between what New Relic is building and what's actually stable in production is wider than the announcement blog posts suggest.
Graylog's AI investment goes the other direction entirely: smaller, narrower, and already just quietly working. Explainable AI handles log parsing and enrichment, and guided ingestion wizards help a two-person IT team get logs flowing correctly without first becoming OpenSearch experts. It's not trying to investigate an incident autonomously. It's trying to make sure the data going into the system is usable, which is a much more modest goal and one Graylog has actually shipped rather than previewed.
| AI capability | New Relic | Graylog |
|---|---|---|
| Autonomous incident investigation | Yes (SRE Agent, Preview Feb 2026) | No |
| No-code AI agent builder | Yes (Agentic Platform, Preview) | No |
| AI-assisted log parsing/enrichment | Limited | Yes |
| GA status of flagship AI feature | Preview | N/A |
Five engineers, full platform access, Pro annual: $1,745 a month in seat fees on New Relic before a single gigabyte of data counts against the bill. That's the number that matters most for a mid-sized engineering org evaluating New Relic, more than the per-GB ingest rate, because seats compound with headcount in a way data volume usually doesn't.
Graylog doesn't have an equivalent single number, because the honest answer depends entirely on which door you walk through. Self-hosted Graylog Open costs nothing in licensing and somewhere between $500 and $5,000 a month in infrastructure, plus 20 to 40 hours a month of someone's time to keep OpenSearch and MongoDB healthy. Graylog Cloud, the managed option, runs about $1,250/month for Operations or $1,550/month for Security at a 10GB/day baseline. Graylog Enterprise and Security as self-hosted annual licenses start at $15,000 and $18,000 a year respectively, with the real number negotiated against your actual volume.
Put those two numbers next to each other and Graylog Security Cloud at $1,550/month looks cheaper than New Relic's $1,745/month in seats alone, and it comes with SIEM capability New Relic doesn't have at any price. But that comparison only holds if logging and threat detection is genuinely the whole job. The moment you need APM or infrastructure metrics in the same place, you're either paying for New Relic's full platform anyway or running two separate tools, and the "Graylog is cheaper" framing stops being the relevant comparison.
| Pricing factor | New Relic | Graylog |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | Yes (100GB + 1 full user, forever) | Yes (Open, self-hosted, unlimited ingestion) |
| Self-hosted option | No | Yes |
| Per-seat fee | Yes (full platform $349/month) | No (license-based, not per-seat) |
| Per-GB ingest fee | Yes ($0.40-$0.60/GB) | No (fixed license or self-hosted) |
| Lowest paid entry point | $10 (first seat, Standard) | $1,250/month (Cloud) or $15,000/yr (Enterprise) |
Neither pricing model above includes a way to actually wake someone up when an alert fires, or a status page to tell customers what's happening. Better Stack folds on-call, incident management, and status pages into the same usage-based pricing as its logs and metrics, so that piece doesn't need a third vendor.
The full reliability lifecycle in one place. Start free, no credit card required. Try Better Stack.
New Relic gaps worth knowing:
Graylog gaps worth knowing:
After comparing the two platforms, it's clear that New Relic and Graylog are solving different problems. That means the decision usually isn't about choosing one over the other, but about deciding which problem you're actually trying to solve.
If you're already using New Relic and are considering Graylog because of your log ingestion costs, switching isn't always the obvious answer. One of New Relic's biggest strengths is that logs, traces, metrics, and APM data all live in the same platform, making it much easier to investigate production issues. Moving logs into Graylog means giving up that unified workflow and managing another platform. That tradeoff usually isn't worthwhile unless your log volume has grown so large that log storage and ingestion dominate your observability bill. At that point, using Graylog for logs while keeping New Relic for everything else can become a practical cost optimization.
On the other hand, if you're evaluating Graylog Security as an alternative to Splunk, New Relic belongs in a different category altogether. While it includes security capabilities, it isn't designed to replace a dedicated SIEM. Graylog Security offers features such as Sigma rules, MITRE ATT&CK mapping, UEBA, and security-focused investigation workflows that simply aren't the focus of New Relic's platform. For SOC teams, Graylog is the more appropriate comparison.
There is one exception that can make the decision much simpler. If FedRAMP authorization is a mandatory requirement, New Relic is the only viable option of the two. Graylog currently doesn't offer a FedRAMP-authorized deployment, which may rule it out for government agencies and organizations with similar compliance requirements.
Ultimately, the decision comes down to whether you need a platform or a specialized capability. If you're looking for a complete observability platform that includes logging alongside APM, infrastructure monitoring, and tracing, New Relic is the stronger fit. If your primary goal is enterprise log management or security operations, Graylog is purpose-built for that job and deserves to be evaluated on those terms.
Neither New Relic nor Graylog includes uptime monitoring, on-call scheduling with phone and SMS, incident management, and customer-facing status pages as a unified product. Better Stack brings all of that together with logs, metrics, and traces, with usage-based pricing and no per-seat fees.
The full reliability lifecycle in one place. Start free, no credit card required. Try Better Stack.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
I have deployed, tried and tested Datadog and New Relic, to help you pick the right observability platform.
There are many alternatives to New Relic's APM offering a better, less complicated and more reliable solution to application monitoring.
Most teams don't outgrow New Relic's capabilities. They outgrow the model it's sold under. Have you ever had to tell an engineer they can't investigate their own service in production because they ...
New Relic vs groundcover compared across APM, log management, infrastructure monitoring, AI investigation, security, and pricing. Understand which platform fits your data residency needs, team structure, and budget.
We use cookies to authenticate users, improve the product user experience, and for personalized ads. Learn more.