Datadog vs. New Relic: a side-by-side comparison for 2024

Jenda Tovarys
Updated on January 11, 2024

Both Datadog and New Relic belong among the frontrunners when it comes to observability products. I've researched, deployed, and tested both. See my side-by-side comparison below.

One of the challenges when deploying a reliable service is picking a suitable observability suite. There's a lot of “fine print” one has to go through before making the final decision, and it's rarely about the pricing or contract. Key differences, at least how I see them, are in the service itself.

That's why I've decided to compare these tools based on the following criteria:

  1. Platform functionality overview
  2. Ease of integration and onboarding
  3. UI & UX
  4. Data querying and visualization
  5. Team Management
  6. Incident management
  7. Pricing
  8. Third-party and community reviews

Datadog vs. New Relic, a side-by-side comparison in 2023

⚖️ Testing conditions

I've deployed both tools on Ubuntu 22.04 server distro. Independently with the same hardware and network resources. I've coded a simple script and deployed a default, out-of-the-box Django server in a virtualenv. From there, I tried to rely solely on vendor-provided documentation and other onboarding resources.

1. Platform functionality overview: Tie

Datadog's main focus is cloud security and monitoring. There are multiple tools such as Cloud Workload Security, Sensitive Data Scanner, Cloud SIEM, Application Security monitoring, etc.

New Relic, on the other hand, is a powerful Application performance monitoring tool. You can see that with Mobile, Synthetics, and Browser monitoring, each being a tool on its own.

Feature Datadog New Relic
Infrastructure monitoring ✓✓ ✓✓
Log management ✓✓ ✓ (logging add-on limited)
APM ✓ (APM needs other products to work) ✓✓
RUM ✓✓
Incident Management ✓✓ ✓✓
Security monitoring ✓✓ ✓ (features are in the early-access phase)
On-boarding platform ✓✓ ✓✓
Freemium plan X ✓✓
SAML SSO ✓✓ ✓✓
SLA Monitoring ✓✓ ✓✓
User-based access ✓✓ ✓✓

✓ - feature is present but somehow is limited

✓✓ - feature is present

X - the platform does not offer this feature

New Relic


New Relic has been around since 2008. Since then, it grew from a set of “simple” monitoring tools to an end-to-end observability suite comprised of 16 main tools. All data is easily accessible from a well-designed UI. What I especially liked about the UI were notifications-like alerts and tips, addressing observability gaps in my data collection.



Datadog was founded just two years later and started out as a cloud infrastructure monitoring tool. Essentially, as of 2023, both tools offer almost the same features, but New Relic put a lot of work into AI in the data analysis.

Better Uptime Dashboard

🔮 Want modern and radically cheaper logging than Datadog or New Relic?

Go to Logtail and start your log management for free in 5 minutes.

2. Ease of integration and deployment: Point New Relic

New Relic

In the case of New Relic, you can sign up for a free-forever, full-access account to test it around. That way, I was not limited by a trial period and could really get to know the features it offers.

To deploy New Relic on my host, I followed the guided installation for APM. This tab included everything I needed, including a code snippet for an infrastructure agent with enabled logging. However, I could not rely on the code snippets entirely since New Relic still does not offer support for logging plugins on Ubuntu 22.04. I found some community workarounds, but 22.04 still does not have official support.


🔭 Want to centralize your metrics and logs?

Go to Logtail and start your log management in 5 minutes.

New Relic's installation script is fully automated. After a successful installation, you get access to newrelic CLI, allowing you to check, config, or troubleshoot your installation. The agent started to report on the performance of my host immediately, and New Relic's UI suggested I move on to setting up python.


Everything, including the issues I've encountered due to my script's lack of complexity, was easy to fix, thanks to documentation. After some minor configuration and script touchups, New Relic received the first data from the APM.


Since I've already researched Datadog before, for my Sentry vs. Datadog article, the entire process felt easier. Nevertheless, when recalling the initial process, I must say that New Relic still beats Datadog in this domain.


The process of deployment is approximately the same. I needed to download and install Datadog's infrastructure monitoring agent. I did this by simply copypasting the generated bash command into the console.

I installed the agent by executing pip install ddtrace. To initialize the APM agent, you need a script like the one you can see in the screenshot below. It can be easily generated in Datadog's APM setup. Both setups are a bit over-engineered on my side, but I figured I could be slightly sloppy with how I spend my resources.


In terms of onboarding support, personally, I find Datadog's documentation really badly structured but well-written. What I mean by that is that finding certain important pages is unnecessarily dreadful, but once you get there, you're golden. However, some issues, including the deployment and troubleshooting of ddtrace, were solved only after consulting the world wide web and GitHub issues.

3. UI and UX: Point New Relic

Both UIs are well designed and offer a light and dark mode. I noticed some color and contrast issues with the dark mode in the case of Datadog's UI, but apart from that, it's only a matter of preference.


New Relic released its new UI at the end of June 2023. A quick google search revealed some initial onboarding issues, mainly users not seeing critical data in the new UI. But apart from that, I think New Relic's new UI is visually pleasing, minimalistic, and purpose-built.


I've spent some time in the Datadog UI and noticed a few things. It takes some time to find your way around, and it's the little things that spoil the entire experience. For example, I only accidentally stumbled upon their academy, which offers complete, browser-based coding exercises for various products, including a complete APM tutorial. This issue is shown in the documentation where individual pages are weirdly linked together, internal hyperlinks do not really lead where they should, or Further reading does not offer a logical succession or context.

Compared side-by-side, New Relic's UI is a bit more intuitive. From querying data to setting up alerts, everything felt easier. New Relic is extremely complex and collects any data from anywhere and yet, has a way of serving you said data in a human digestible way.

4. Data querying and visualization: Point Datadog


All of the data I provided to New Relic was available from the UI. A simple, click-based environment. For more advanced data workflows, New Relic built its query language - NRQL, which feels a lot like the standard SQL for the queries. On top of that, New Relic supports PromQL queries and interprets them to the NRQL language as best as possible.


Datadog offers a custom query syntax that is based on terms and operators. Terms represent general or unique identification, operators take care of the searching logic. To create a search query, I needed to combine these terms with logic operators AND, OR, and - instead of NOT. When creating custom queries, I mostly leveraged the click-based query builder, which I find easy to work with. The only limitation of Datadog I can find here is the 15-minute cap on live data queries.

When it comes to Dashboard creation, both tools offer click-based creation tools, which make it really easy to create custom dashboards and even throw some memes in.

5. Team-management: Point New Relic

Especially in the case of New Relic, understanding user roles is crucial for pricing, platform integrity, and security. User access is also important in incident management and impacts how well teams can collaborate within the platform.


New Relic reinvented its user model and, as of 2023, offers three main user roles, defined in the documentation like this:

  • Full platform user - has unlimited access to the entire platform
  • Core user (previously standard) - has access to more developer-centric features, like CodeStream or Logs UI
  • Basic user - has access to basic features like setting up observability tools or alerts and dashboards


In the case of Datadog, users are key in Incident management, which is priced per user per month. Essentially, you get an unlimited amount of users for free and then have to set up user roles for each, and those who are active in incident management are billed at the end of the month. Once again, there are three tiers:

  • Admin - An user with full-platform access
  • Standard - Users can access key workflow features such as events or monitors. These users can also invite new users to the platform.
  • Read-only - This role is used for sharing view-only dashboards and visualizations, e.g., access made for clients, etc.

6. Incident management and alerting: Point Datadog

During the initial setup, asked me if I want to automatically monitor the Four Golden Signals Thanks to this setup option, New Relic automatically generated UI-alerts when it lost contact with my application.

🔔 Four Golden Signals

Google SRE handbook in the chapter on Monitoring Distributed Systems defines these as the following key performance metrics:

  • Latency - A measure of time of a successful request takes
  • Traffic - How much demand is being placed on the system
  • Errors - The rate of failed and successful requests
  • Saturation - The amount of strain put on individual system resources


I could address this incident directly from the UI by drilling down to my python service and then addressing issues, errors, and incidents. After acknowledging the incident, I manually closed it and created a dummy post-mortem. The entire process felt easy and seamless. I did not, however, integrate New Relic with a third-party on-call scheduling, or status pages solution.


The incident management is more or less the same in the case of Datadog, but this time, the setup was super easy. Both incident declaration, alerting policies, and remediation, including the auto-generated postmortem, were user-friendly.

In terms of incident management, I think Datadog has the upper hand, mainly with little details, making the workflow more coherent, such as the option to add a link to a video call or the incident declaration and workflow itself.

🔮 Want to collaborate on solving incidents from one place?

Go to Better Uptime and start managing your incidents in 2 minutes.

7. Pricing: Point New Relic


New Relic offers a rather generous free subscription tier, offering one full platform user and 100Gbs of ingested data. This tier can be elevated to a subscription with additional data or users. To get more enterprise-standard tools like SAML SSO, SLA, and Advanced admin capabilities, you'd need to subscribe to PRO or Enterprise tiers. In summary, New Relic's pricing strategy is based on data, where you pay $0.30/GB for anything above the 100GB cap and the number and type of users.


Datadog has a decentralized pricing model, each product has its own pricing logic. For example, APM & Continous profiler is priced per host, the same applies to Infrastructure monitoring, a requirement for APM. Other features, like log management, are billed based on ingested data, and incident management is billed per contributing user. Datadog has no full-platform pricing publicly advertised, it's arranged with their sales team, with the option of volume discounts.

8. Third-party and community reviews and my personal preference: Point New Relic

Third-party references and community reviews are a great source of really use-specific reviews. A quick search of major platforms like G2, Reddit, or Twitter gives the general idea of what a hands-on experience of real users is like.

In the case of New Relic, the first thing I thought of (and I was not alone) was what's the catch with the free subscription. There's literally a Reddit thread asking the same question. In terms of positive reviews, users mostly brought up APM features and accuracy, some also liked how New Relic processes data, reliability and availability, and onboarding support.

Regarding negatives, users found the UI & UX overwhelming with a very stiff learning curve. A subcategory of this issue was tool grouping, where one tool is a part of multiple categories, and users do not find the grouping logic intuitive. However, I can't say with certainty if they're addressing the newly redesigned UI or the previous one. Other, less recurring complaints were about the NRQL language and “lacking fine-tuning when compared to SQL”, and more control over the metrics sent to New Relic, which is important since New Relic bills users per data ingested.

In Datadog's positive reviews, users highlight a wide range of integrations and the convenience of monitoring everything from one place.

Datadog's users complain mainly about issues related to pricing, documentation, and tech support. In the case of pricing, it's mainly about the fact that the pricing is quite complex, but also Datadog is expensive in general. Users find documentation either chaotic or outdated.

Generally, Datadog gets a lot of almost grotesque hate on the internet. There are a bunch of running jokes on Reddit about the tactics of sales teams, but I think there's a lot of bandwagoning going on.

In a side-by-side comparison, I could conclude that Datadog wins in the fields of Infrastructure and cloud monitoring, security monitoring, integrations, and community. New Relic, on the other hand, is preferred for real-time performance data analysis, support, and pricing (it's not cheaper, just easier to grasp).

Final Thoughts

Personally, from a solo user standpoint, I prefer New Relic thanks to the generous free full-access tier, documentation, and support. However, when trying to empathize with engineers on a bigger scale, I think for infrastructure monitoring, I'd rather invest in Datadog. And to monitor complex applications, I would go with New Relic. As for incident management, I'd integrate everything with Better Uptime.

Anyway, that's it for today, if you got all the way here, thank you for reading my article, and see you at the next one. In the meantime, check out my side-by-side comparison of Sentry and Datadog.

Make your mark

Join the writer's program

Are you a developer and love writing and sharing your knowledge with the world? Join our guest writing program and get paid for writing amazing technical guides. We'll get them to the right readers that will appreciate them.

Write for us
Writer of the month
Marin Bezhanov
Marin is a software engineer and architect with a broad range of experience working...
Build on top of Better Stack

Write a script, app or project on top of Better Stack and share it with the world. Make a public repository and share it with us at our email.

or submit a pull request and help us build better products for everyone.

See the full list of amazing projects on github