TortoiseORM vs SQLAlchemy: An In-Depth Framework Comparison
SQLAlchemy and TortoiseORM are popular Python ORMs, both simplifying database interactions but with different approaches.
SQLAlchemy is he most popular choice, known for its flexibility, deep customization, and support for synchronous and asynchronous workflows. It is well-suited for complex applications that require detailed management of database interactions.
TortoiseORM on the other hand, is built with an async-first approach, making it ideal for high-performance, modern applications. Inspired by Django’s ORM, it simplifies database interactions with minimal boilerplate while maintaining efficiency.
This article will break down their differences, strengths, and ideal use cases to help you decide which ORM best suits your project.
What is SQLAlchemy?
SQLAlchemy is Python’s leading database toolkit and ORM, offering profound control over relational databases.
It was built by Mike Bayer in 2005 and it combines a Core layer for precise SQL queries with an ORM layer that maps tables to Python classes.
Unlike simpler ORMs, SQLAlchemy extends SQL capabilities, providing high-level abstractions without obscuring control. It supports multiple databases, complex relationships, and advanced transactions, making it a strong choice for performance-driven applications.
What is TortoiseORM?
TortoiseORM is built for modern Python, embracing async programming from the ground up rather than as an afterthought. Inspired by Django’s ORM, it provides an intuitive model syntax and query patterns while fully supporting async/await, making it a strong choice for high-concurrency applications.
With a focus on developer experience, TortoiseORM keeps models concise, queries straightforward, and the API easy to use. Its lightweight design ensures efficient database operations, enhancing both development speed and maintainability.
TortoiseORM vs. SQLAlchemy: a quick comparison
Choosing between these ORMs affects both development efficiency and application performance. Each is designed with a distinct philosophy, making them better suited for different scenarios.
The following comparison highlights key differences to consider:
| Feature | TortoiseORM | SQLAlchemy |
|---|---|---|
| Primary paradigm | Async-first with sync support | Sync-first with async support via SQLAlchemy 2.0 |
| Learning curve | Gentle, Django-like syntax | Steeper, more concepts to master |
| Performance | Optimized for async workloads | Battle-tested performance, extensive optimization options |
| Query building | Intuitive query API with filtering | Comprehensive expression language, multiple query APIs |
| Migration support | Built-in via Aerich | Requires Alembic (first-party) |
| Relationship handling | Simple references with prefetch support | Sophisticated relationship loading with many strategies |
| Transaction management | Context-based transactions | Flexible session-based approach |
| Ecosystem | Growing, focused on async frameworks | Extensive, mature ecosystem with broad support |
| Model definition | Clean class-based models with field types | Declarative mapping or imperative table definitions |
| Raw SQL support | Basic support for raw queries | Comprehensive SQL expression language |
| Type hints | Native Python type annotations | Type hints via SQLAlchemy 2.0, stubs available |
| Database support | PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite, others via drivers | Extensive support for almost all SQL databases |
| Testing | In-memory SQLite for quick tests | Multiple testing approaches, including fixtures |
| Community size | Smaller but growing community | Large, established community with extensive resources |
Model definition
The way an ORM defines models shapes the entire developer experience. A well-structured model should be clear, maintainable, and aligned with the application's needs.
SQLAlchemy and TortoiseORM take distinct approaches to model definition, reflecting their underlying philosophies.
SQLAlchemy embraces flexibility through its multi-layered architecture. Models typically follow the Declarative pattern, where tables and columns are explicitly defined with numerous configuration options. This design provides precise control but introduces more verbosity:
SQLAlchemy's approach gives you explicit control over table names, column types, and relationship configurations, but requires more code and understanding of SQLAlchemy's concepts.
TortoiseORM takes inspiration from Django's ORM, offering a more concise, declarative approach. Models are defined as classes with fields as attributes, using a more intuitive syntax that reduces boilerplate.
TortoiseORM's syntax is more intuitive if you're familiar with Django, with fields directly corresponding to database columns and sensible defaults that reduce configuration overhead.
Query building
The approach to building and executing queries is where these ORMs show their distinct philosophies.
SQLAlchemy provides multiple query APIs, including a powerful SQL Expression Language that enables complex queries with fine-grained control.
The ORM layer builds on this foundation, offering high-level query methods and direct access to underlying SQL constructs.
SQLAlchemy queries can be constructed incrementally and offer precise control over joins, filtering, and result handling. This power comes with a learning curve, as you need to understand concepts like sessions, query construction, and execution flow.
TortoiseORM focuses on a more straightforward, method-chaining approach inspired by Django's QuerySet API. This design prioritizes readability and ease of use, especially for common operations:
TortoiseORM's query syntax is more intuitive, especially if you are coming from Django.
The async/await pattern integrates naturally with modern Python applications, while filter lookups (like username__startswith) provide a clean way to express conditions.
Transaction management
Another key difference between these ORMs is how they handle transactions. Transaction management is important for maintaining data integrity and performance, and SQLAlchemy and TortoiseORM take distinct approaches.
SQLAlchemy uses a session-based approach, where a session represents a transaction and serves as the primary interface for database operations.
This design offers flexibility but requires careful management.
For more structured transaction handling, SQLAlchemy provides context managers:
SQLAlchemy's session concept offers powerful features like identity map, unit of work, and lazy loading, but requires understanding these patterns to use effectively.
TortoiseORM simplifies transaction management with a straightforward context manager approach that aligns well with Python's async/await syntax:
For more explicit control, you can use the transaction object:
TortoiseORM's approach is more straightforward, especially in async contexts, making transaction management feel more Pythonic and reducing the likelihood of errors.
Relationship handling
Managing relationships between models is critical to any ORM, as it determines how efficiently related data can be accessed and manipulated.
SQLAlchemy offers sophisticated relationship management with multiple loading strategies, providing precise control over how related objects are loaded and accessed.
SQLAlchemy supports multiple loading strategies:
lazy="select": Default lazy loading (separate query when accessed)lazy="joined": Eager loading with JOINlazy="subquery": Eager loading with subquerylazy="selectin": Eager loading with SELECT IN
You can also load relationships dynamically:
This flexibility allows for optimizing database access patterns for different scenarios, reducing the number of queries, and improving performance.
TortoiseORM takes a more straightforward relationship approach, using field references with prefetch support to manage related objects.
TortoiseORM handles relationship loading through prefetching:
While TortoiseORM's approach is more straightforward, it offers fewer optimization strategies than SQLAlchemy. However, prefetch_related provides a clean way to avoid the N+1 query problem that often affects ORM performance.
Migration support
Database schema evolution is important for application maintenance, and both ORMs offer different approaches to managing migrations.
SQLAlchemy doesn't include built-in migration capabilities, but it's typically paired with Alembic, a first-party migration tool developed by the same team. Alembic provides powerful features for managing schema changes, including automatic migration generation and complex migration paths.
Using Alembic requires additional setup and learning, but it provides industrial-strength migration capabilities:
TortoiseORM takes a more integrated approach with Aerich, its companion migration tool designed specifically for TortoiseORM models. Aerich simplifies the migration workflow while maintaining the necessary flexibility for schema evolution.
Aerich commands are straightforward and aligned with TortoiseORM's design philosophy:
The migration files are also quite readable:
Aerich's tight integration with TortoiseORM offers a smoother migration experience, especially for applications that don't require the advanced features provided by Alembic.
Type hints and validation
Modern Python development relies heavily on type annotations, and both ORMs have taken different approaches to supporting this important feature.
SQLAlchemy has evolved its typing support over time, with version 2.0 introducing comprehensive type hints that integrate with mypy and other type checkers. These type hints provide better IDE completion and catch potential errors earlier in development.
SQLAlchemy's typing system is powerful but can be complex, especially when dealing with result sets and query returns.
TortoiseORM was initially designed with typing in mind, offering native Python annotations that work smoothly with standard type checkers. This integration makes models and queries more self-documenting and helps catch type-related errors early.
TortoiseORM's approach to typing feels more natural in modern Python codebases, with field definitions that directly map to their Python types and methods that return correctly typed results.
Raw SQL support
Sometimes ORMs can't express every query you need, making raw SQL support essential for complex database operations.
SQLAlchemy excels at bridging the gap between ORM abstractions and raw SQL. Its expression language can represent virtually any SQL operation, and when that's not enough, it provides direct text SQL execution with proper parameter binding.
SQLAlchemy's approach allows smooth integration of raw SQL with ORM queries, making it possible to leverage database-specific features while maintaining the benefits of the ORM.
TortoiseORM provides more straightforward but effective support for raw queries. While not as comprehensive as SQLAlchemy, it offers the essentials for most use cases.
While TortoiseORM's raw SQL capabilities are more limited than SQLAlchemy's, they cover the essentials needed for most applications, allowing you to escape the ORM when necessary.
Testing support
Both ORMs offer different approaches to testing database interactions.
SQLAlchemy's maturity shines in its testing support, offering multiple approaches to testing database code. The session-based design makes it easy to use transaction rollbacks to isolate tests, while connection pooling can be configured for optimal test performance.
SQLAlchemy's flexible architecture supports various testing approaches, from in-memory databases to mocking at different layers. However, this flexibility means you must set up the testing infrastructure yourself.
TortoiseORM simplifies testing with built-in utilities specifically designed for its async nature. The test client makes it easy to set up and tear down test databases, while the in-memory SQLite support allows for fast test execution.
TortoiseORM also provides a test client for integration testing:
TortoiseORM's testing utilities are particularly well-suited for async applications, making it easier to test database interactions in frameworks like FastAPI or Starlette.
Final thoughts
This article compared TortoiseORM and SQLAlchemy to help you decide which fits your Python application needs.
TortoiseORM excels for async applications, with a clean API and Django-inspired models. SQLAlchemy remains the comprehensive solution with unmatched flexibility and a powerful query system, now with improved async support in version 2.0.
If you need modern async support and intuitive models, choose TortoiseORM. If you require maximum flexibility and extensive relationship features, SQLAlchemy is still an excellent choice.
Ultimately, both are high-quality options—choose based on your specific project requirements, team expertise, and development priorities.