Back to Scaling Python Applications guides

Poetry vs Rye: A Comprehensive Guide to Python Package Management

Stanley Ulili
Updated on July 25, 2025

The Python packaging world is changing fast. Poetry has dominated for years with its smart dependency management, but Rye is shaking things up with a completely different approach to how Python tooling should work.

Poetry won over developers by solving dependency hell with smart constraint resolution and the pyproject.toml standard that everyone uses now. It makes complex dependency management feel simple and predictable.

Rye takes a unified toolchain approach, handling not just dependencies but Python installations, virtual environments, and builds through one fast interface built with Rust.

This guide breaks down their key differences, shows you real examples, and helps you pick the right tool for your projects.

What is Poetry?

Screenshot of Poetry Github page

Poetry changed how developers think about Python projects. It brought predictable dependency management to an ecosystem where "works on my machine" was the norm.

Poetry's strength is making complex things simple without hiding the details. You specify what you need, and Poetry figures out the complicated version matching, handles conflicts, and manages environments. The poetry.lock file guarantees everyone on your team gets identical setups.

Poetry became the go-to choice for teams moving away from pip's chaos to modern Python development.

What is Rye?

Screenshot of Rye Github page

Rye asks a simple question: What if you built Python tooling from scratch today? Armin Ronacher created Rye to answer this by throwing out Python's historical baggage.

Rye doesn't just manage dependencies—it handles your entire development stack. It installs Python versions, creates projects with smart defaults, and uses fast Rust tools that make other Python tools feel slow.

This all-in-one approach eliminates the hassle of juggling multiple tools while sticking to Python standards that work with everything else.

Poetry vs. Rye: a quick comparison

These tools show two different visions for Python's future: gradual improvement versus complete redesign. Their differences reveal what you value most in your development workflow.

Feature Poetry Rye
Philosophy Elegant dependency management Unified Python toolchain
Installation System-wide installer Self-contained with Python management
Configuration Poetry-specific pyproject.toml sections Standards-compliant pyproject.toml
Virtual environments Automatic creation and management Workspace-integrated environments
Python version handling Requires external tools (pyenv) Built-in Python installation
Dependency resolution Custom solver with detailed output Rust-powered uv resolver
Performance Moderate, improving steadily Significantly faster operations
Lock file format poetry.lock (custom format) requirements.lock (pip-compatible)
Build system Poetry-core backend Configurable PEP 517 backends
Standards compliance Poetry extensions + standards Strict standards adherence
Learning curve Gentle for existing Python users Requires workflow adjustment
IDE support Mature integration everywhere Growing support, newer ecosystem
Monorepo support Basic multi-project capabilities Advanced workspace management
Community adoption Widely established, proven track record Emerging with strong architectural vision

Installation and getting started

Your first experience with these tools reveals their different philosophies about complexity. The installation process often determines whether you stick with a tool long-term.

Poetry requires a dedicated installer but gives you a stable, well-documented experience:

 
# Install Poetry
curl -sSL https://install.python-poetry.org | python3 -

# Create and set up project
poetry new my-project
cd my-project
poetry install

Poetry assumes you already have Python installed and manages everything else. The installation process is straightforward, and you get comprehensive documentation.

Rye handles Python installation for you but requires learning new concepts:

 
# Install Rye (manages Python versions too)
curl -sSL https://rye-up.com/get | bash

# Create and set up project
rye init my-project
cd my-project
rye sync  # Installs Python + dependencies

Rye's approach eliminates Python version headaches but means adjusting to its unified workflow model.

Speed and performance in daily use

Performance affects your daily workflow more than you might think. Slow dependency resolution breaks your flow and makes CI/CD pipelines expensive.

Poetry has gotten faster but still shows noticeable delays on larger projects:

 
# Adding a new dependency
time poetry add requests
# Usually takes 10-30 seconds

# Installing all dependencies
time poetry install
# Can take 45-90 seconds for complex projects

Rye's Rust-powered tools deliver dramatically faster operations:

 
# Adding a new dependency
time rye add requests
# Usually takes 2-8 seconds

# Installing all dependencies
time rye sync
# Usually takes 8-20 seconds for complex projects

If you work on large projects or run CI/CD frequently, Rye's speed advantage becomes significant.

Dependency management approach

Dependency handling affects project reliability and team collaboration. The lock file format determines reproducibility across environments and deployment success.

Poetry uses its own lock file format with detailed dependency trees:

 
# pyproject.toml
[tool.poetry.dependencies]
python = "^3.11"
fastapi = "^0.104.0"

# poetry.lock (simplified)
[[package]]
name = "fastapi"
version = "0.104.1"
dependencies = [
    {name = "pydantic", version = "^2.4.0"},
]

Poetry's lock file is comprehensive but only works with Poetry. It provides excellent conflict resolution but can be slow.

Rye generates pip-compatible lock files that work with standard Python tools:

 
# pyproject.toml (standard format)
[project]
dependencies = ["fastapi>=0.104.0"]

# requirements.lock (pip-compatible)
fastapi==0.104.1
pydantic==2.4.2
    # via fastapi

Rye's approach ensures you're never locked into one tool, and the lock files work everywhere.

Python version management

Managing Python versions creates common pain points for development teams. The approach each tool takes affects team onboarding time and deployment consistency.

Poetry delegates Python version management to external tools:

 
# You need pyenv or similar
pyenv install 3.11.6
pyenv local 3.11.6

# Then use Poetry
poetry env use python3.11
poetry install

This separation gives you flexibility but requires coordinating multiple tools. Team members need to install and configure pyenv separately.

Rye manages Python installations directly:

 
# Rye handles Python installation
rye pin 3.11.6  # Downloads and installs if needed
rye sync        # Uses the right Python version

# Check available versions
rye toolchain list

Rye's integrated approach eliminates "Python version not found" errors and ensures team consistency.

Project structure and standards compliance

Project structure decisions affect long-term maintainability and compatibility with other tools. Standards compliance determines your future flexibility and vendor lock-in risk.

Poetry creates traditional package structures with some custom extensions:

 
# Poetry project structure
my-project/
├── pyproject.toml          # Mix of standard + Poetry sections
├── poetry.lock            # Poetry-specific format
├── my_project/            # Traditional layout
│   └── __init__.py
└── tests/

# Poetry-specific configuration
[tool.poetry]
name = "my-project"
[tool.poetry.dependencies]
python = "^3.11"

Poetry's approach works well but includes proprietary extensions that tie you to Poetry.

Rye follows Python packaging standards strictly:

 
# Rye project structure
my-project/
├── .python-version        # Python version file
├── pyproject.toml         # Standard format only
├── requirements.lock      # Pip-compatible
├── src/my_project/        # Modern src-layout
│   └── __init__.py
└── README.md

# Standards-compliant configuration
[project]
name = "my-project"
dependencies = ["requests>=2.31.0"]

Rye's standards compliance ensures compatibility with any Python tool and future ecosystem changes.

IDE and editor integration

IDE support affects your daily coding experience. Mature integration means better autocomplete, debugging, and project management.

Poetry has excellent IDE support across all major editors:

 
# Most IDEs automatically detect Poetry projects
# VS Code, PyCharm, Vim, Emacs all have extensions
# Virtual environments are recognized automatically
poetry run python  # IDEs understand this context

Poetry's maturity means robust integration everywhere. Your IDE probably already supports Poetry projects without additional setup.

Rye's IDE support is growing but not yet universal:

 
# Growing support in major IDEs
# Some manual configuration may be needed
# Virtual environments work but might need setup
rye run python  # IDE support improving

If IDE integration is critical for your workflow, Poetry currently has the advantage.

Team collaboration and CI/CD

Team workflows determine project success. Lock file compatibility, CI/CD setup complexity, and onboarding time all matter.

Poetry provides mature team collaboration with comprehensive lock files:

 
# GitHub Actions setup
steps:
  - uses: snok/install-poetry@v1
  - run: poetry install
  - run: poetry run pytest

# Team workflow
git pull
poetry install  # Gets exact versions from lock file

Poetry's established ecosystem includes official GitHub Actions and Docker configurations.

Rye simplifies team workflows through standards compliance:

 
# GitHub Actions setup
steps:
  - uses: eifinger/setup-rye@v1
  - run: rye sync
  - run: rye run pytest

# Team workflow
git pull
rye sync  # Gets exact Python version + dependencies

Rye's advantage is that production deployments can use standard pip with requirements.lock.

Publishing and distribution

Package publishing workflows matter if you plan to release code to PyPI. The publishing process affects release frequency and maintenance overhead.

Poetry includes integrated publishing with semantic versioning:

 
# Built-in publishing workflow
poetry version patch      # 1.0.0 -> 1.0.1
poetry build             # Create wheel and sdist
poetry publish           # Upload to PyPI

# Configuration in pyproject.toml
[tool.poetry]
name = "my-package"
version = "1.0.0"

Poetry makes publishing straightforward with built-in version management and PyPI integration.

Rye uses standard tools for publishing but requires more manual steps:

 
# Publishing with standard tools
# Version management is manual
rye build                # Uses configured build backend
rye publish --repository pypi

# Standard configuration
[project]
name = "my-package"
version = "1.0.0"

Rye's approach gives you flexibility but requires understanding standard Python packaging tools.

Learning curve and migration

The effort required to adopt a new tool impacts team productivity and project timelines. Migration complexity determines whether you can switch tools gradually or need a complete workflow overhaul.

Poetry has a gentle learning curve for Python developers:

 
# Familiar concepts
pip install -> poetry add
pip freeze -> poetry show
virtualenv -> poetry shell (optional)

Poetry concepts map well to existing Python knowledge. You can introduce Poetry gradually to existing projects.

Rye requires learning a unified workflow model:

 
# New unified commands
rye sync    # Replaces multiple pip/venv commands
rye add     # Similar to pip install but different
rye run     # No virtualenv activation needed

Rye's unified approach is more efficient but requires adjusting established workflows.

Final thoughts

Poetry and Rye address Python dependency management with different philosophies. Poetry is reliable, feature-rich, and user-friendly, suitable for stability and ecosystem support. Rye emphasizes performance, simplicity, and modern standards, offering streamlined workflows.

Got an article suggestion? Let us know
Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Make your mark

Join the writer's program

Are you a developer and love writing and sharing your knowledge with the world? Join our guest writing program and get paid for writing amazing technical guides. We'll get them to the right readers that will appreciate them.

Write for us
Writer of the month
Marin Bezhanov
Marin is a software engineer and architect with a broad range of experience working...
Build on top of Better Stack

Write a script, app or project on top of Better Stack and share it with the world. Make a public repository and share it with us at our email.

community@betterstack.com

or submit a pull request and help us build better products for everyone.

See the full list of amazing projects on github