Conda vs Pip: Choosing the Right Python Package Manager
Two main tools are commonly used for managing Python packages: Pip and Conda. Both help with managing dependencies, but they work in different ways.
Pip is Python's default package installer, focusing specifically on Python packages from the Python Package Index (PyPI). It's lightweight, bundled with Python, and excels at managing pure Python dependencies.
Conda takes a broader approach as a cross-platform package manager that handles packages beyond just Python. Created by Anaconda, Inc., it manages virtual environments and packages for multiple languages, making it particularly valuable for scientific computing and data science.
This article compares their approaches, strengths, and ideal use cases to help you decide which package manager best suits your project needs.
What is Pip?
Pip is Python's official package installer, providing a straightforward way to install packages from PyPI (Python Package Index). It focuses solely on Python packages and comes pre-installed with Python distributions.
Developed by the Python Packaging Authority (PyPA), Pip has been the standard way to install Python packages since 2008. It uses a simple command-line interface to install, upgrade, and remove Python packages, resolving dependencies as needed.
Pip maintains a focused approach on Python packages unlike more complex package managers. It handles wheel and source distribution installation, supports reproducibility requirements files, and integrates with virtual environments for project isolation.
What is Conda?
Conda is a cross-platform package manager and environment management system created by Anaconda, Inc. Unlike Pip's Python-specific focus, Conda handles packages for multiple languages and provides integrated environment management.
Initially developed for scientific computing needs, Conda addresses complex dependency challenges by treating Python itself as a package. This approach allows Conda to manage non-Python libraries and binaries that many scientific packages depend on, such as C libraries, R packages, and system-level dependencies.
With environment management built in, Conda simplifies creating isolated spaces for different projects, each with their own dependencies and even Python versions. Its robust dependency resolver ensures compatibility across the entire environment, not just among Python packages.
Conda vs Pip: a quick comparison
Your choice between these package managers impacts development workflow, dependency management, and deployment. Each is designed with distinct principles, making them suitable for different scenarios.
The following comparison highlights key differences to consider:
| Feature | Conda | Pip |
|---|---|---|
| Primary focus | Language-agnostic package management | Python-specific package installation |
| Package source | Anaconda repository and custom channels | Python Package Index (PyPI) |
| Environment management | Built-in (conda create/activate) | Requires separate tools (virtualenv/venv) |
| Dependency resolution | SAT solver for complex constraint solving | Simpler resolution, improving in newer versions |
| Binary package handling | Pre-built binaries for many platforms | Relies on wheels when available |
| Non-Python dependencies | Handles C libraries and system dependencies | Limited to Python packages |
| Installation scope | Requires separate installation | Comes bundled with Python |
| Upgrade handling | Updates entire environment consistently | Updates packages individually |
| Configuration | Environment YAML files | Requirements.txt files |
| Storage efficiency | Larger disk footprint | Smaller disk footprint |
| Corporate/enterprise use | Commercial support available | Community support |
| Data science integration | Optimized for scientific packages | General Python package management |
| Learning curve | Steeper with more concepts | Gentler, more focused commands |
| Package creation | Conda recipe system | Standard setuptools/packaging |
Installation and setup
The initial experience with a package manager shapes your workflow. Conda and Pip have different installation processes that reflect their different scopes and philosophies.
Pip comes bundled with Python, immediately available after a Python installation. This built-in availability means you can start installing packages right away without additional setup:
For environment isolation, Pip is typically paired with Python's built-in venv module or the third-party virtualenv tool:
Pip's approach keeps things lightweight but requires combining multiple tools for a complete workflow.
Conda requires a separate installation, typically through the Anaconda distribution (which includes many pre-installed scientific packages) or the lighter-weight Miniconda (which includes just Conda and its dependencies):
Conda's installation is more involved initially, but it provides an integrated approach to both package and environment management. You get a consistent interface for creating environments, activating them, and installing packages—all through a single tool.
Environment management
Managing isolated environments for projects is essential for reproducibility and avoiding dependency conflicts. Conda and Pip take fundamentally different approaches to this challenge.
Pip doesn't include built-in environment management, instead relying on Python's virtual environment capabilities. The typical workflow involves creating a virtual environment, activating it, and then using Pip within that environment:
This separation of concerns keeps each tool focused but requires learning multiple commands and patterns. The requirements.txt file becomes the key to reproducing environments, though it only lists Python packages, not the Python version or system dependencies.
Conda integrates environment management directly, treating environments as first-class concepts:
Conda's integrated approach simplifies the workflow with consistent commands. The environment.yml file captures not just the packages but also channels, Python version, and platform-specific dependencies, making environment reproduction more reliable across different systems.
Here's an example environment.yml file:
Conda's unified approach to environment management provides a smoother experience, especially for projects with complex dependencies across multiple languages.
Package installation and dependency resolution
The heart of any package manager is how it installs software and resolves dependencies. This is where Conda and Pip reveal their most significant philosophical differences.
Pip uses a relatively straightforward dependency resolver to install Python packages from PyPI. It processes dependencies sequentially, installing each package and its dependencies in turn:
Pip's approach is direct and works well for many Python projects. However, it can sometimes struggle with complex dependency networks, potentially leading to conflicts. Recent versions have improved the resolver, but challenges remain, especially with packages that have complex version constraints.
For large projects, a requirements.txt file manages dependencies:
Conda uses a more sophisticated constraint solver (a SAT solver) to determine a compatible set of packages before any installation begins. This approach handles complex dependency networks more reliably:
Conda's dependency resolution considers the entire environment at once, including non-Python dependencies and packages from different languages. This comprehensive approach is particularly valuable for scientific computing, where Python packages often depend on compiled C/C++ libraries.
A key strength of Conda is its ability to install pre-compiled binary packages for multiple platforms, avoiding the need to compile from source:
This command installs PyTorch with the appropriate CUDA dependencies—something that would be considerably more complex with Pip, potentially requiring manual installation of system libraries.
Package sources and availability
Where packages come from and what types are available significantly influences which package manager best suits your needs.
Pip installs packages exclusively from the Python Package Index (PyPI), a vast repository of Python packages maintained by the Python community. This focused approach means virtually every pure Python package is available:
Pip's integration with PyPI provides access to over 350,000 Python packages, covering nearly every Python use case. However, Pip primarily handles Python-specific packages and relies on wheels (pre-compiled binaries) when available or falls back to building from source.
Conda pulls packages from its own repositories, primarily Anaconda's default repository and community channels like conda-forge:
Conda repositories contain fewer packages than PyPI overall but include many non-Python dependencies crucial for scientific computing. The conda-forge channel has significantly expanded package availability, though some newer or niche Python packages might still only be available on PyPI.
Conda can also install Pip packages when needed, providing access to both ecosystems:
This hybrid approach allows Conda to manage the core environment while still accessing PyPI-only packages, though mixing package managers can occasionally lead to conflicts.
Configuration and reproducibility
Reliable configuration and environment reproducibility are critical for team collaboration and deployment. Conda and Pip offer different approaches to these challenges.
Pip relies on requirements.txt files to capture dependencies, a simple but effective approach for Python-only projects:
A typical requirements.txt file looks like this:
For more complex projects, you might use additional tools like pip-tools to manage dependencies more effectively:
This approach works well for Python-centric projects but doesn't capture the Python version or system dependencies.
Conda uses environment.yml files, which provide a more comprehensive environment definition:
A conda environment file captures channels, Python version, and platform-specific details:
You can also create simplified environment files for better cross-platform compatibility:
Conda's approach provides more comprehensive environment capture, particularly valuable for complex scientific applications or cross-platform development.
Practical workflows
The day-to-day usage patterns of these package managers reveal how they fit into different development workflows.
Pip excels in Python-focused development with straightforward dependency requirements. It integrates seamlessly with Python development tools and workflows:
This lightweight approach works well for web development, scripting, and many application types where Python is the primary language. When integrated with tools like tox or nox, you can test across multiple Python versions:
Conda shines in data science, scientific computing, and cross-language projects, providing an integrated environment for complex dependencies:
For machine learning workflows, Conda simplifies GPU integration:
Conda's integrated environment management is particularly valuable for reproducible research and computational notebooks:
The ability to share a single environment.yml file that captures all dependencies, including the correct Python version and non-Python libraries, simplifies collaboration in research settings.
Final thoughts
This article compared Conda and Pip to help you choose the best package manager for your Python projects.
Pip is a lightweight, Python-focused tool perfect for web and app development. It integrates with PyPI, giving access to a vast collection of Python packages and is easy to use.
Conda, with its broader environment management and multi-language support, is ideal for data science and scientific computing. It handles complex dependencies, especially for packages with C/C++ or GPU support.
For simple Python projects, Pip with virtual environments is a good choice. For projects with complex dependencies, like data science, Conda is a stronger option. Many developers use both: Pip for Python projects and Conda for data science or scientific work. Some even combine them to manage environments with Conda and Python-specific packages with Pip. Ultimately, both are excellent tools—choose based on your specific project requirements, team expertise, and whether you need to manage dependencies beyond the Python ecosystem.