Two of the hardest things to monitor are the service sitting behind your firewall, which a public probe network cannot reach, and the user journey locked behind two-factor authentication, which most synthetic checks cannot log into. Uptime.com does both, with private location monitoring on every plan and a transaction recorder that supports TOTP, and Statuspage does neither, because Statuspage does not monitor anything at all.
Uptime.com is a comprehensive external monitoring platform, mature and purpose-built, with more than 30 check types, a no-code transaction recorder, private location monitoring, and a real branded status page sold as a separate module. It answers one question thoroughly: is this reachable, from here, right now. Statuspage is Atlassian's communication layer, a polished, deeply branded page built for posting incidents and notifying subscribers, priced by subscriber tier up to $1,499 a month, that measures nothing on its own.
Both ship a status page, and here that word means close to the same thing, because Uptime.com's page is a genuine product rather than an uptime dashboard. So this comparison is tighter than most: one gives you the monitoring and a capable page as separate modules, the other gives you the strongest page and no monitoring. Which wins turns on how much you value the watching against the polish and the ecosystem.
| Category | Statuspage, Atlassian | Uptime.com |
|---|---|---|
| Built for | Incident communication | Comprehensive external monitoring |
| Built-in monitoring | ✘, integration only | ✔, 30+ check types |
| Probe locations | N/A | 100+ |
| Private location monitoring | ✘ | ✔, all plans, behind firewall |
| Transaction monitoring | ✘ | ✔, recorder with TOTP for 2FA |
| Cloud status monitoring | ✘ | ✔, third-party status pages |
| Real user monitoring | ✘ | ✔, separate module |
| SLA reporting | ✘ | ✔, scheduled reports |
| Status page | Branded communication surface | Strong, separate module |
| Subscriber channels | Email, SMS, Slack, Teams, webhook | Page notifications |
| Incident workflow | Communication only | Alerts and escalations, no on-call |
| MCP server | ✘ | ✘ |
| Free plan | 100 subscribers, no monitoring | ✘, modules from $5 to $19 |
| Entry paid price | Hobby $29/mo | Website Monitoring $7/mo |
| Top standard tier | Enterprise $1,499/mo | Typically $24 to $455/mo |
| SSO | Via Atlassian Guard | On all plans |
| Best fit | Branded incident communication | Monitoring everything, plus a page |
The two products do different jobs, though they meet more closely on the status page than most pairs. One watches from the outside; the other communicates.
Uptime.com is a mature platform built to answer one question well: is this endpoint reachable, from these locations, right now. It covers that ground with more than 30 check types, a probe network in 100-plus locations, private locations for internal services, a transaction recorder, SLA reporting, RUM, and status pages, all through a clean interface with SSO available on every plan. What it does not do is show you what is happening inside your application, so when a check fails you learn which endpoint stopped responding and from where, and the investigation into why moves to your logs, your APM, and your metrics in other tools.
Statuspage created the status page category in 2013 and publishes a polished, deeply branded page where you post incident updates and notify subscribers when something breaks. It has no monitoring, so the page reflects what a human or a connected tool tells it, and its value is the communication itself: incident posts, subscriber management, audience-specific pages, and the Atlassian ecosystem behind it. It is built for teams that treat the page as a customer trust surface.
| What it is | Statuspage | Uptime.com |
|---|---|---|
| Primary job | Communicate incidents | Monitor availability |
| Detects outages | ✘ | ✔ |
| Monitors behind a firewall | ✘ | ✔, private locations |
| Status page | The main product | A strong module |
| Root cause visibility | ✘ | ✘, external only |
This is Uptime.com's home ground, and its range is wider than most tools at any price. The question is how many kinds of things you need to watch, and from where.
Uptime.com's basic checks span SSL and certificate expiry, HTTPS, DNS, WHOIS and domain, SMTP, POP, IMAP, UDP, malware and virus scanning, SSH, NTP, domain blacklist, TCP port, ping, and FTP and SFTP, and its advanced checks add API monitoring, transaction monitoring, page speed, webhook monitoring, heartbeat and cron checks, and cloud status monitoring that watches third-party status pages like your cloud provider's. Checks run from 100-plus locations with multi-location confirmation to cut false positives, and SLA reporting turns the results into shareable, scheduled reports. Statuspage runs none of this, so to make its page move on its own you connect an external monitor, which is one common reason these two land in the same stack. The one caveat on Uptime.com is that advanced checks are limited at entry tiers, so a transaction-heavy setup needs a higher plan than the $7 headline.
| Monitoring breadth | Statuspage | Uptime.com |
|---|---|---|
| Basic check types | ✘ | 15+, SSL to FTP |
| Advanced check types | ✘ | API, transaction, page speed, more |
| Cloud status monitoring | ✘ | ✔ |
| SLA reporting | ✘ | ✔, scheduled |
| Probe locations | N/A | 100+ |
Uptime.com tells you which endpoint failed and from where, and Statuspage sees nothing at all, but neither shows you why. Better Stack runs checks from locations worldwide and links a failure straight to the logs and traces from that moment, so you move from alert to cause without leaving the tool.
Monitoring wired to the logs and traces that explain the failure. Start free.
This is where Uptime.com reaches ground that most monitoring tools, and Statuspage entirely, cannot. The question is whether you need to test the flows and services that sit behind a login or a firewall.
The transaction recorder lets you define a multi-step user journey in a Chromium browser without writing a script: you record a login, a search, or a checkout once, and it runs on schedule from the probe network, with screenshots on failure showing exactly which step broke. Its TOTP support means even flows protected by two-factor authentication can be tested, which few tools at this price offer. Private location monitoring runs those same check types from behind your own firewall, covering internal services and intranet applications a public probe can never see, and it is available on all plans rather than gated to enterprise. Where Uptime.com stops is inside the application: a failed transaction tells you which step broke and what the browser saw, not which database query timed out or which service call errored, because that data lives in tools Uptime.com does not include. Reviewers also note the recorder can be fiddly for very complex flows. Statuspage has none of this, since it monitors nothing.
| Transaction and private | Statuspage | Uptime.com |
|---|---|---|
| Transaction recorder | ✘ | ✔, no-code |
| 2FA and TOTP flows | ✘ | ✔ |
| Screenshots on failure | ✘ | ✔ |
| Private location monitoring | ✘ | ✔, all plans |
| Application-level root cause | ✘ | ✘ |
Uptime.com shows you the failed step and a screenshot, and Statuspage shows you nothing, but neither names the backend call that broke it. Better Stack correlates a failed synthetic flow with the traces and logs behind it, so you see the timeout at the payment gateway or the database error directly.
A failed flow linked to the backend trace that caused it. Explore Better Stack.
Here the two meet more evenly than Statuspage usually does with a monitoring tool, because Uptime.com's page is a real communication product. The question is whether you need the top of the customization ceiling or a capable page that syncs from your monitoring.
Uptime.com's status pages are branded, public or private, and update automatically from its own checks, with incident and maintenance communication, a service-health overview, and SLA reporting built in, sold as a module from $19 a month. That is a genuine status page, not an uptime dashboard, and for many teams it is enough on its own. Statuspage still reaches higher at the top end: full CSS, HTML, and JavaScript customization on its Business plan, audience-specific pages that show different components to different customers, and subscriber notifications across email, SMS, Slack, Teams, and webhooks, though those channels sit behind higher tiers. So Uptime.com gives you a strong page that reflects real monitoring, and Statuspage gives you the deeper communication surface, and the gap between them is narrower here than the price difference suggests.
| Status pages | Statuspage | Uptime.com |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Branded communication surface | Branded, public and private |
| Updates from own monitoring | ✘, integration | ✔, automatic |
| Audience-specific pages | ✔ | ✘ |
| Deep customization | Business $399 | Standard branding |
| Subscriber channels | Email, SMS, Slack, Teams, webhook | Page notifications |
| Pricing | Tiered by subscribers | Module from $19/mo |
Uptime.com's page syncs from monitoring but is a paid module, and Statuspage reaches subscribers but monitors nothing. Better Stack publishes a branded page that updates automatically from its own checks and notifies subscribers across email, SMS, Slack, and webhooks, included with the platform.
A branded page that reflects real monitoring and reaches subscribers. See how it works.
Uptime.com adds RUM as a module, which puts it ahead of Statuspage's nothing on this axis, though it is lighter than a full digital-experience product. The question is whether basic real-user data is what you need.
Uptime.com's RUM module, from $5 a month, collects real visitor performance across browsers, devices, and locations, complementing the synthetic checks with data on what users actually experience. It is a separate subscription from monitoring, and it is a lighter product than a full RUM tool, without session replay or deep funnel analysis, but for a team that wants a sense of real-user load performance alongside external checks it does the job. Statuspage offers no RUM, no synthetic measurement, and no performance data at all, so on this axis the comparison is Uptime.com against nothing.
| Real user monitoring | Statuspage | Uptime.com |
|---|---|---|
| RUM | ✘ | ✔, module from $5/mo |
| Session replay | ✘ | ✘ |
| Real-user page speed | ✘ | ✔ |
| Separate subscription | N/A | ✔ |
Uptime.com alerts and escalates, Statuspage neither detects nor pages, and neither runs a full incident workflow. The question is what happens between a failed check and a resolved incident.
Uptime.com detects the incident and alerts through email, SMS, push, and integrations like Slack and PagerDuty, with escalation rules to move an unacknowledged alert onward. What it does not include is a full incident workflow: no on-call scheduling with rotations, no post-mortems, and no incident timeline of the kind a dedicated incident tool provides, so serious on-call still routes to a separate product. Statuspage holds only the customer-facing post, so both detection and paging live in the tools you connect. Between the two, Uptime.com at least raises the alert and escalates it, and can prove afterward how long the outage ran through its SLA reports.
| Alerting and incident | Statuspage | Uptime.com |
|---|---|---|
| Detects the incident | ✘ | ✔ |
| Alert channels | Subscriber notifications | Email, SMS, push, integrations |
| Escalation rules | ✘, external | ✔ |
| On-call scheduling | ✘, external | ✘, external |
| Post-mortems | ✘ | ✘ |
Uptime.com escalates alerts but stops short of on-call rotations and post-mortems, and Statuspage neither detects nor pages. Better Stack includes on-call scheduling, unlimited phone and SMS alerts, escalation policies, and automatic post-mortems alongside the monitoring and the status page, at $29/month per responder.
On-call scheduling and post-mortems in the same tool that catches the outage. See incident management.
The two prices are structured differently, and Uptime.com's à la carte model is the thing to model carefully. Statuspage sells one subscription by subscriber tier; Uptime.com sells monitoring, RUM, and status pages as separate modules.
Statuspage's public pages run from a free tier at 100 subscribers up through Hobby at $29, Startup at $99, Business at $399, and Enterprise at $1,499 per month, gating SMS at $99 and full customization at $399, with private and audience-specific pages billed separately. Because it monitors nothing, a working setup also includes a monitoring tool. Uptime.com has no traditional free tier and prices by module: Website Monitoring from $7 a month with a bundle of basic and advanced checks, Real User Monitoring from $5 a month, and Status Pages from $19 a month, each added separately, with annual billing saving around 20%. The headline is low, but advanced checks are limited at entry tiers, so a transaction-heavy deployment with RUM and status pages runs into the low hundreds a month, with third-party sources citing $24 to $455 depending on check volume and add-ons. For a team that mainly needs monitoring plus a page, Uptime.com is far cheaper than Statuspage plus a separate monitor; for a team that needs only the page, Statuspage's own tiers are the more direct comparison.
| Pricing | Statuspage | Uptime.com |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | 100 subscribers, no monitoring | ✘, 30-day money-back |
| Entry paid | Hobby $29/mo | Website Monitoring $7/mo |
| RUM | ✘ | Module from $5/mo |
| Status page | Included in tier | Module from $19/mo |
| Typical real cost | Up to $1,499/mo | $24 to $455/mo |
| Structure | One subscription | Separate modules |
Both carry enterprise features, and each leads in a different place. What does procurement get from each?
Statuspage inherits Atlassian's compliance posture, SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA, and ISO 27001, with SSO and SCIM through Atlassian Guard, aimed at a regulated organization treating the page as a trust surface. Uptime.com offers SSO on every plan, private location monitoring for internal and regulated environments, and SLA reporting for contractual uptime, which serves security-conscious and infrastructure teams well, but it is a smaller vendor, so a buyer with strict HIPAA or ISO requirements should confirm its current attestations directly. For a regulated customer-facing page, Statuspage goes further; for monitoring internal and private infrastructure under compliance constraints, Uptime.com's private locations and all-plan SSO are the more useful features.
| Compliance and enterprise | Statuspage | Uptime.com |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 / HIPAA / ISO 27001 | ✔, via Atlassian | Confirm directly |
| SSO | Via Atlassian Guard | All plans |
| Private infrastructure monitoring | ✘ | ✔, private locations |
| SLA reporting | ✘ | ✔ |
| Ecosystem | Atlassian | Standalone, integrations |
For a team that wants to monitor everything, including the internal services and 2FA-locked flows most tools cannot reach, and to publish a real status page alongside it, Uptime.com does far more than Statuspage for far less money. Its 30-plus check types, no-code transaction recorder, private locations on every plan, and a branded status page module make it a one-vendor answer to monitoring and communication, where Statuspage answers only the second half.
Statuspage still holds the top of the page itself. If you need audience-specific pages, the deepest branding and customization, subscriber notifications across SMS, Slack, and webhooks, or Atlassian's compliance and ecosystem, Statuspage's communication layer goes further than Uptime.com's status module, which is a capable add-on rather than the main event.
Two things temper the Uptime.com case. Its monitoring, RUM, and status pages are separate modules, so the $7 headline becomes three line items by the time you have real coverage, and it runs alerts and escalations but not a full incident workflow with on-call scheduling and post-mortems. And when a transaction fails, neither tool tells you which service or query caused it. A team that wants the monitoring, the page, the on-call, and the root cause in one place is past the point either of these can serve alone.
Uptime.com watches from outside and Statuspage communicates, and neither pages a responder through a full workflow or explains the failure. Better Stack brings multi-location monitoring, RUM, a branded status page with subscribers, on-call scheduling, incident management, and a full observability data layer into one platform, so monitoring, communication, paging, and root cause live in one workflow.
Monitoring, status pages, on-call, and observability in one platform. Start free, no credit card required. Try Better Stack.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Statuspage by Atlasssian is one of the main status page providers. It is undoubtedly a great tool with great functionality. However, for many smaller teams and hobbyists, there are many alternatives that offer similar services at a much more affordable price point.
Atlassian Statuspage is a polished communication layer that monitors nothing; Hyperping matches it on page design and adds monitoring, browser checks, and on-call, EU-first and flat-priced from $24. Compare status pages, monitoring, on-call, and 2026 pricing.
Atlassian Statuspage is a polished, hosted communication layer that monitors nothing; Uptime Kuma is a free, self-hosted monitor with a status page you run yourself. Compare monitoring, reliability, status pages, and real total cost for 2026.
We use cookies to authenticate users, improve the product user experience, and for personalized ads. Learn more.