How to Handle Non-matching Logstash Grok Filters

In Logstash, handling non-matching Grok filters is essential to ensure that data processing continues even if a Grok pattern fails to match. By default, if a Grok pattern doesn't match, Logstash adds a _grokparsefailure tag to the event, but you can customize how to handle these failures.

Here are different ways to handle non-matching Grok filters effectively:

1. Using Multiple Patterns in Grok (Fallback Patterns)

You can define multiple Grok patterns for the same input, and Logstash will try them one by one until one matches. This helps handle variations in log formats.

Example:

filter {
  grok {
    match => { "message" => ["%{COMMONAPACHELOG}", "%{COMBINEDAPACHELOG}"] }
  }
}

In this case, Logstash will first try to match the COMMONAPACHELOG pattern. If it fails, it will try COMBINEDAPACHELOG.

2. Handling _grokparsefailure with Conditionals

When a Grok pattern fails to match, Logstash adds a _grokparsefailure tag by default. You can use conditional statements to handle these failures by taking alternative actions, such as logging the event or sending it to a different output.

Example:

filter {
  grok {
    match => { "message" => "%{COMMONAPACHELOG}" }
  }

  if "_grokparsefailure" in [tags] {
    mutate {
      add_tag => ["failed_grok"]
    }
    # Optionally remove the _grokparsefailure tag to avoid clutter
    mutate {
      remove_tag => ["_grokparsefailure"]
    }
  }
}

In this example, if the Grok pattern doesn't match, the _grokparsefailure tag is added. You can also add a custom tag like failed_grok for further handling or troubleshooting.

3. Using Grok with break_on_match => false

By default, Logstash stops checking additional patterns once a match is found. You can set break_on_match to false to force Logstash to try all patterns and not stop after the first match.

Example:

filter {
  grok {
    match => { "message" => ["%{COMMONAPACHELOG}", "%{COMBINEDAPACHELOG}"] }
    break_on_match => false
  }
}

With break_on_match => false, Logstash will attempt all patterns even if a previous one matches, which can be useful when parsing multiple fields in the same log message.

4. Redirecting Non-Matching Grok Events to a Separate Output

You can send events that fail the Grok parsing to a separate output (such as a different Elasticsearch index or a file) for troubleshooting.

Example:

filter {
  grok {
    match => { "message" => "%{COMMONAPACHELOG}" }
  }

  if "_grokparsefailure" in [tags] {
    # Send failed events to a different index for further investigation
    mutate {
      add_tag => ["failed_logs"]
    }
  }
}

output {
  if "failed_logs" in [tags] {
    file {
      path => "/var/log/logstash_failed_logs.log"
    }
  } else {
    elasticsearch {
      hosts => ["localhost:9200"]
      index => "apache_logs"
    }
  }
}

In this example, failed logs are written to a file for later review, while successfully parsed logs are sent to Elasticsearch.

5. Using grok { tag_on_failure => [] } to Disable _grokparsefailure

If you don't want Logstash to add the _grokparsefailure tag when a Grok pattern doesn't match, you can use the tag_on_failure option and set it to an empty array.

Example:

filter {
  grok {
    match => { "message" => "%{COMMONAPACHELOG}" }
    tag_on_failure => []
  }
}

This will prevent the _grokparsefailure tag from being added, which can be useful if you want to handle failures in a different way or simply ignore them.

6. Using the dissect Filter for Simpler Parsing

If your log structure is consistent but the Grok filter is too complex, you can use the dissect filter as a lightweight alternative. It works well for simple and consistent logs.

Example:

filter {
  dissect {
    mapping => {
      "message" => "%{client_ip} - - [%{timestamp}] \\"%{method} %{request} HTTP/%{http_version}\\" %{response_code} %{bytes}"
    }
  }
}

Unlike Grok, the dissect filter is faster and doesn't rely on regular expressions, making it a good choice for simple log parsing tasks.

7. Using Try-Catch Style Grok with the if Conditional

You can combine Grok parsing with if conditionals to implement a try-catch-like mechanism. If the Grok pattern fails, you can provide alternative actions.

Example:

filter {
  grok {
    match => { "message" => "%{COMMONAPACHELOG}" }
  }

  if "_grokparsefailure" in [tags] {
    # Try an alternative Grok pattern or process the event differently
    grok {
      match => { "message" => "%{SYSLOGBASE}" }
      remove_tag => ["_grokparsefailure"]
    }
  }
}

In this example, if the first Grok pattern fails, the filter tries to apply another pattern (e.g., SYSLOGBASE). You can handle different log formats this way.

Conclusion

To handle non-matching Grok filters in Logstash:

• Use multiple Grok patterns for flexibility.
• Handle _grokparsefailure tags with conditionals to log or send non-matching events to a different output.
• Use tag_on_failure => [] to disable failure tags if needed.
• Try simpler parsing methods like the dissect filter when appropriate.
• Redirect failed Grok parsing events to separate logs or outputs for troubleshooting.

These techniques allow you to manage log data even when Grok patterns do not match and avoid losing important information.

Got an article suggestion? Let us know

Explore more

Logstash

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.