9 Best Node.js Alternatives

Node.js has ruled JavaScript server-side development for over a decade. It's the first choice for building scalable backend applications. But Node.js isn't perfect for every project. You might hit security problems, performance issues, or need newer JavaScript features that Node.js doesn't handle well.

The JavaScript runtime world has changed a lot. New alternatives fix Node.js's problems and add features that weren't possible before.

I tested over 15 JavaScript runtimes on different projects and performance tests. Here are the 9 best alternatives that are changing how developers build server-side JavaScript applications.

Node.js characteristics

Node.js changed backend development by bringing JavaScript to servers. It runs on Chrome's V8 engine and uses an event-driven system that handles many operations at once without blocking.

Node.js uses npm for package management, which created the world's biggest software library. Its single-threaded event loop works great for apps that do lots of input/output operations, like real-time chat systems and API servers.

Node.js helps you build apps fast because it has thousands of ready-made modules. You can use your JavaScript skills for both frontend and backend development.

Node.js alternatives comparison

Here's how each runtime compares on important features:

1. Bun

Bun changes how you think about JavaScript runtimes. It combines super-fast performance with an all-in-one approach. You don't need separate package managers, bundlers, or test runners anymore.

🌟 Key features

• JavaScriptCore engine that runs much faster than V8
• Built-in package manager that works with npm and installs packages much faster
• Bundler and transpiler that handles TypeScript, JSX, and modern JavaScript
• Test runner that works like Jest but runs faster
• Hot reloading for quick development
• WebSocket and HTTP servers built for speed
• SQLite database with type-safe queries
• Works with Node.js APIs so you can migrate easily

➕ Pros

• You get huge performance boosts - startup times are up to 4x faster than Node.js
• You eliminate tool mess by combining package management, bundling, and testing in one tool
• You use much less memory while handling more connections at once
• You speed up development with instant hot reloading and faster package installs
• You get modern JavaScript features without complex setup
• You can migrate existing Node.js projects easily
• You benefit from frequent updates and performance improvements

➖ Cons

• You work with a smaller ecosystem - some npm packages need adjustments
• You're using newer technology that might have unknown issues in production

2. Deno

Deno rebuilds the JavaScript runtime from scratch. It focuses on security, TypeScript support, and modern web standards. It learns from Node.js's mistakes and fixes them.

🌟 Key features

• Secure by default - you must give explicit permission for file, network, and environment access
• TypeScript works out of the box without setup or compilation
• You import modules using URLs instead of package.json and node_modules
• Built-in tools include formatter, linter, documentation generator, and test runner
• Web APIs that match browser standards like Fetch, WebSocket, and streaming
• Standard library that covers common development needs
• WebAssembly support and modern JavaScript features
• Development server with automatic TypeScript compilation

➕ Pros

• You build apps with better security through permission controls
• You use TypeScript easily without complex setup
• You reduce project complexity by removing package management overhead
• You get a curated standard library that follows web standards
• You deploy apps confidently with built-in security features
• You maintain code quality with integrated development tools
• You benefit from a runtime built with modern best practices

➖ Cons

• You need to learn different module patterns
• You work with fewer third-party packages compared to npm

3. Quasar

Quasar connects JavaScript runtimes with full-stack development. It gives you a complete platform that combines server-side execution with rich client-side features.

🌟 Key features

• Unified development environment for multiple deployment targets
• Cross-platform support for web, mobile, and desktop apps
• Component-based architecture with Vue.js for reactive interfaces
• Built-in state management and routing
• Complete UI component library with Material Design and iOS themes
• Progressive Web App features with offline functionality
• Electron integration for desktop apps
• Cordova support for mobile apps

➕ Pros

• You build apps for multiple platforms with one codebase
• You develop faster with complete component libraries and tools
• You create consistent experiences across different devices
• You reduce complexity by combining frontend and backend workflows
• You get extensive documentation and learning resources
• You use the Vue.js ecosystem while keeping server-side capabilities
• You deploy efficiently across different environments

➖ Cons

• You must use Vue.js, which might not fit all projects
• You face a learning curve if you don't know Vue.js patterns

4. Hermes

Hermes focuses on mobile JavaScript execution. It's designed specifically for React Native apps and gives excellent performance on devices with limited resources.

🌟 Key features

• JavaScript engine optimized for mobile device limits
• Ahead-of-time compilation that reduces app startup time
• Memory-efficient execution with mobile-tuned garbage collection
• Bytecode compilation for faster app loading
• React Native integration with seamless debugging
• Chrome DevTools compatibility for familiar development
• Optimized ES6+ features with excellent performance
• Small runtime footprint for embedded systems

➕ Pros

• You get superior mobile performance with faster startup and less memory use
• You improve user experience through optimized JavaScript execution on mobile
• You reduce app size with efficient bytecode compilation
• You access excellent debugging tools and development experience
• You benefit from Facebook's mobile JavaScript optimization work
• You deploy confidently on devices with limited resources
• You keep compatibility with modern JavaScript features

➖ Cons

• You focus mainly on mobile and React Native use cases
• You have limited use for general server-side development

5. QuickJS

QuickJS provides a lightweight JavaScript engine that can be embedded anywhere. It excels when you need minimal resource use while supporting modern JavaScript standards.

🌟 Key features

• Compact JavaScript engine with tiny memory footprint
• ES2020 support including modules, async/await, and modern syntax
• Mathematical precision with arbitrary precision integers and decimals
• Embeddable design for integration into other applications
• Fast startup time perfect for scripting and automation
• REPL environment for interactive JavaScript development
• Complete test suite ensuring JavaScript specification compatibility
• Cross-platform support across different operating systems

➕ Pros

• You deploy apps with minimal resource needs perfect for embedded systems
• You get fast startup times ideal for command-line tools and automation
• You keep modern JavaScript compatibility without runtime overhead
• You embed JavaScript capabilities into existing applications easily
• You access mathematical precision for computational applications
• You benefit from a clean, focused runtime without unnecessary complexity
• You can use it for learning JavaScript fundamentals

➖ Cons

• You work with limited ecosystem and third-party library support
• You lack advanced features like HTTP servers and database connectivity

6. GraalVM

GraalVM gives you a universal runtime that lets JavaScript apps work seamlessly with Java, Python, and other languages. It delivers exceptional performance through advanced compilation techniques.

🌟 Key features

• Universal virtual machine supporting multiple programming languages
• Ahead-of-time compilation that produces native executables with faster startup
• Polyglot programming that enables seamless integration between languages
• Advanced optimization techniques including partial evaluation and speculation
• Native image generation for containerized deployments
• Complete debugging and profiling tools
• Enterprise-grade security features and compliance certifications
• Extensive ecosystem integration with Java libraries and frameworks

➕ Pros

• You get exceptional performance through advanced compilation and optimization
• You integrate JavaScript apps with existing Java enterprise infrastructure
• You reduce container image sizes and startup times with native compilation
• You access complete tooling for debugging and performance analysis
• You use enterprise-grade security features and support
• You benefit from Oracle's virtual machine technology investment
• You deploy confidently in enterprise environments

➖ Cons

• You navigate complex setup and configuration requirements
• You need to understand multiple runtime concepts and compilation strategies

7. Wasmer

Wasmer uses WebAssembly technology to create a universal runtime that executes JavaScript alongside other languages. It provides enhanced security and performance characteristics.

🌟 Key features

• WebAssembly-based runtime providing language-agnostic execution
• Enhanced security model with sandboxed execution environment
• Cross-platform compatibility with consistent behavior across systems
• Package management system supporting multiple programming languages
• Container-like isolation without traditional container overhead
• WASI support enabling file system and network access
• Plugin architecture for extending runtime capabilities
• Performance optimizations through WebAssembly compilation

➕ Pros

• You execute JavaScript with enhanced security through WebAssembly sandboxing
• You access universal package management supporting multiple languages
• You deploy apps with consistent behavior across different platforms
• You benefit from WebAssembly's performance characteristics and security model
• You integrate with existing WebAssembly ecosystem and tools
• You reduce deployment complexity through universal runtime approach
• You access innovative approaches to application isolation and security

➖ Cons

• You work with emerging technology that may have limited production examples
• You navigate WebAssembly-specific concepts and development patterns

8. Txiki

Txiki combines the QuickJS engine with system-level capabilities. It creates a lightweight runtime that provides essential I/O operations while using minimal resources.

🌟 Key features

• QuickJS engine integration providing modern JavaScript support
• System-level APIs for file system, network, and process management
• Minimal runtime footprint suitable for resource-constrained environments
• ES module support with dynamic imports and modern syntax
• Built-in utilities for common system operations
• Cross-platform compatibility across major operating systems
• Simple deployment model without complex dependency management
• Real-time capabilities for system monitoring and automation

➕ Pros

• You build system utilities and automation tools with minimal resource overhead
• You access essential system APIs without runtime bloat
• You deploy applications quickly with simple dependency management
• You keep modern JavaScript compatibility in lightweight environments
• You create efficient command-line tools and system scripts
• You benefit from fast startup times and low memory usage
• You access system-level capabilities through clean JavaScript APIs

➖ Cons

• You work with limited ecosystem and third-party library availability
• You focus on system-level applications rather than web development

9. Boa

Boa is an experimental JavaScript engine written in Rust. It focuses on correctness, security, and modern language implementation while providing educational insights into JavaScript engine design.

🌟 Key features

• Rust implementation providing memory safety and performance characteristics
• Complete ECMAScript specification compliance
• Educational codebase designed for learning JavaScript engine internals
• Experimental features for testing language proposals
• Security-focused design with Rust's memory safety guarantees
• Modular architecture enabling custom JavaScript runtime creation
• Extensive test suite ensuring specification compliance
• Developer-friendly error messages and debugging capabilities

➕ Pros

• You explore JavaScript engine development with memory-safe implementation
• You access educational resources for understanding JavaScript internals
• You benefit from Rust's performance and safety characteristics
• You contribute to experimental JavaScript features and proposals
• You create custom JavaScript runtimes for specialized applications
• You access complete documentation and learning materials
• You participate in open-source JavaScript engine development

➖ Cons

• You work with experimental technology not suitable for production applications
• You have limited ecosystem and practical deployment examples

Final thoughts

If Node.js no longer serves your project's needs, Bun is the most compelling alternative. It delivers remarkable performance improvements, maintains excellent compatibility with existing Node.js projects, and consolidates your entire development toolchain into a single, lightning-fast runtime.

The JavaScript runtime landscape has evolved far beyond Node.js's original vision, with each alternative addressing specific limitations while introducing innovative approaches to server-side development.

Your choice should align with your primary constraints: whether that's performance bottlenecks, security requirements, mobile optimization, or enterprise integration needs.

Got an article suggestion? Let us know

Explore more

Top 10 Django Alternatives for Python Web Development

Discover the top 10 Django alternatives for Python web development in 2025. Compare FastAPI, Flask, Tornado, and more frameworks with performance benchmarks, pros/cons, and real-world use cases to find the perfect fit for your project.

Top Next.js Alternatives for Web Developers in 2025

Looking for a Next.js alternative in 2025? Explore the top frameworks that offer better flexibility, performance, and developer experience. Compare React Router v7, SvelteKit, TanStack Start, Nuxt.js, Astro 5, and Gatsby—all tested for real-world use

Rust vs Go vs Zig

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.