HTMX vs React

HTMX and React represent fundamentally different philosophies in web development, each offering distinct advantages for building interactive applications.

React dominates the frontend landscape with its component-based architecture, virtual DOM, and extensive ecosystem. It empowers developers to build complex, stateful applications with sophisticated user interfaces and rich interactions.

HTMX takes a radically different approach, extending HTML with attributes that enable dynamic behavior directly in markup. This philosophy eliminates much of the complexity associated with traditional JavaScript frameworks while maintaining powerful interactivity.

This comprehensive guide examines their core differences, implementation approaches, and ideal use cases to help you choose the right tool for your next project.

What is React?

React revolutionized frontend development by introducing a declarative, component-based approach to building user interfaces. Created by Facebook in 2013, it has grown into the most widely adopted JavaScript library for web applications.

React's strength lies in its component architecture, where UI elements are broken down into reusable pieces that manage their own state and lifecycle. The virtual DOM provides efficient updates by calculating minimal changes needed to sync the actual DOM, resulting in smooth user experiences even in complex applications.

Beyond its core library, React's ecosystem includes state management solutions, routing libraries, and development tools that collectively provide a complete framework for building modern web applications.

What is HTMX?

HTMX represents a return to HTML-centric development while adding modern interactive capabilities. Rather than replacing HTML with JavaScript frameworks, it enhances HTML with attributes that trigger AJAX requests, update DOM elements, and handle user interactions.

Built on the principle that HTML should be capable of expressing rich user interactions, HTMX allows developers to create dynamic applications without writing extensive JavaScript. It leverages hypermedia as the engine of application state, making server-side rendering the primary driver of application behavior.

This approach significantly reduces frontend complexity while maintaining the responsiveness users expect from modern web applications. HTMX proves that simplicity and power can coexist in web development.

HTMX vs. React: a quick comparison

The choice between these technologies fundamentally shapes your application architecture and development approach. Each represents a distinct philosophy about how web applications should be built and maintained.

The following comparison highlights essential differences to guide your decision:

Application architecture

The fundamental difference between HTMX and React lies in where application logic and state reside, shaping every aspect of development from initial setup to long-term maintenance.

React embraces client-side architecture where the browser becomes a sophisticated application platform. Components manage local state, handle user interactions, and coordinate with backend APIs to deliver rich user experiences:

const UserProfile = ({ userId }) => {
  const [user, setUser] = useState(null);
  const [editing, setEditing] = useState(false);

  useEffect(() => {
    UserService.getUser(userId).then(setUser);
  }, [userId]);

  const handleSave = async (updatedUser) => {
    const savedUser = await UserService.updateUser(userId, updatedUser);
    setUser(savedUser);
    setEditing(false);
  };

  return (
    <div className="user-profile">
      {editing ? (
        <UserEditForm user={user} onSave={handleSave} />
      ) : (
        <UserDisplay user={user} onEdit={() => setEditing(true)} />
      )}
    </div>
  );
};

This architecture provides fine-grained control over user interactions and enables sophisticated client-side optimizations like optimistic updates and intelligent caching.

HTMX shifts this complexity to the server, treating the backend as the authoritative source of application state and UI updates. HTML responses drive interface changes, simplifying client-side logic:

<div id="user-profile" hx-get="/users/123" hx-trigger="load">
  Loading user profile...
</div>

<!-- Server response updates the content -->
<div class="user-details">
  <h2>John Doe</h2>
  <p>Email: john@example.com</p>
  <button hx-get="/users/123/edit" hx-target="#user-profile">
    Edit Profile
  </button>
</div>

<!-- Edit form loaded via HTMX -->
<form hx-put="/users/123" hx-target="#user-profile">
  <input type="text" name="name" value="John Doe" />
  <input type="email" name="email" value="john@example.com" />
  <button type="submit">Save Changes</button>
  <button hx-get="/users/123" hx-target="#user-profile">Cancel</button>
</form>

HTMX's server-centric approach eliminates client-side state synchronization challenges while maintaining responsive user experiences through targeted DOM updates.

State management

How applications handle state determines complexity, maintainability, and developer experience across the entire project lifecycle.

React offers multiple state management approaches, from built-in hooks for local component state to sophisticated libraries for global application state. This flexibility accommodates everything from simple forms to complex data relationships:

// Local state with hooks
const [user, setUser] = useState(null);
const [loading, setLoading] = useState(false);

// Context for shared state
const UserContext = createContext();

const UserProvider = ({ children }) => {
  const [currentUser, setCurrentUser] = useState(null);

  const login = async (credentials) => {
    const user = await authService.login(credentials);
    setCurrentUser(user);
  };

  return (
    <UserContext.Provider value={{ currentUser, login }}>
      {children}
    </UserContext.Provider>
  );
};

// External state management (Redux Toolkit)
const userSlice = createSlice({
  name: 'user',
  initialState: { data: null, loading: false },
  reducers: {
    fetchUserStart: (state) => { state.loading = true; },
    fetchUserSuccess: (state, action) => { 
      state.loading = false;
      state.data = action.payload;
    }
  }
});

React's state management ecosystem provides solutions for every complexity level, but requires architectural decisions about where state lives and how components access it.

HTMX fundamentally changes state management by keeping authoritative state on the server. Client-side state becomes primarily cosmetic, handling loading indicators and form validation while the server manages business logic:

<!-- Server maintains user state, client reflects it -->
<div id="shopping-cart" hx-get="/cart" hx-trigger="load">
  <!-- Server renders current cart state -->
</div>

<!-- Adding items updates server state -->
<button hx-post="/cart/items" 
        hx-target="#shopping-cart"
        hx-vals='{"product_id": 42, "quantity": 1}'>
  Add to Cart
</button>

<!-- Real-time updates via server-sent events -->
<div hx-ext="sse" sse-connect="/cart/updates">
  <div sse-swap="cart-total" hx-target="#cart-total">
    <!-- Updates from server when other users modify shared cart -->
  </div>
</div>

Server-side state management:

# Python/Django example
def update_cart(request):
    cart = get_user_cart(request.user)
    product = get_object_or_404(Product, id=request.POST['product_id'])
    cart.add_item(product, int(request.POST['quantity']))

    return render(request, 'cart/cart_fragment.html', {'cart': cart})

This approach eliminates state synchronization bugs and reduces complexity, especially in applications with multiple users accessing shared data.

User interactions and events

The way frameworks handle user interactions shapes the development experience and determines how responsive applications feel to end users.

React provides a comprehensive event system that integrates seamlessly with JavaScript, offering fine-grained control over user interactions through synthetic events and custom handlers:

const InteractiveForm = () => {
  const [formData, setFormData] = useState({ name: '', email: '' });
  const [isSubmitting, setIsSubmitting] = useState(false);

  const handleInputChange = (e) => {
    const { name, value } = e.target;
    setFormData(prev => ({ ...prev, [name]: value }));
  };

  const handleSubmit = async (e) => {
    e.preventDefault();
    setIsSubmitting(true);

    try {
      await submitForm(formData);
      setFormData({ name: '', email: '' });
    } finally {
      setIsSubmitting(false);
    }
  };

  return (
    <form onSubmit={handleSubmit}>
      <input
        type="text"
        name="name"
        value={formData.name}
        onChange={handleInputChange}
      />
      <button type="submit" disabled={isSubmitting}>
        {isSubmitting ? 'Submitting...' : 'Submit'}
      </button>
    </form>
  );
};

React's event handling excels at creating immediate feedback and complex interaction patterns, though it requires managing multiple pieces of state.

HTMX simplifies interactions by extending HTML with attributes that declaratively specify behavior. This approach reduces JavaScript while maintaining sophisticated user experiences:

<!-- Form with real-time validation -->
<form hx-post="/users" hx-target="#form-container">

  <!-- Real-time validation on input -->
  <input type="text" 
         name="username"
         hx-post="/validate/username"
         hx-target="#username-error"
         hx-trigger="blur delay:500ms" />
  <div id="username-error"></div>

  <!-- Submit button with loading state -->
  <button type="submit" hx-disable-during="request">
    <span class="default">Create User</span>
    <span class="htmx-indicator">Creating...</span>
  </button>
</form>

<!-- Advanced interactions -->
<div hx-get="/notifications"
     hx-trigger="every 30s"
     hx-target="#notification-area">
</div>

<div hx-post="/items/reorder"
     hx-trigger="dragend"
     hx-include="closest form">
</div>

HTMX's declarative approach makes complex interactions readable in HTML while offloading processing to the server. This creates maintainable code that's easier to understand and debug.

Performance characteristics

Performance considerations differ significantly between client-side and server-side approaches, affecting everything from initial page loads to ongoing user interactions.

React applications typically have larger initial bundle sizes but can provide incredibly fast subsequent interactions through client-side rendering and intelligent caching strategies:

// Code splitting reduces initial bundle size
const LazyComponent = lazy(() => import('./ExpensiveComponent'));

// Memoization prevents unnecessary re-renders
const OptimizedList = memo(({ items, onItemClick }) => (
  <div>
    {items.map(item => (
      <ListItem key={item.id} item={item} onClick={onItemClick} />
    ))}
  </div>
));

// Efficient state updates
const TodoApp = () => {
  const [todos, setTodos] = useState([]);

  const addTodo = useCallback((text) => {
    setTodos(prev => [...prev, { id: Date.now(), text }]);
  }, []);

  return (
    <div>
      <TodoInput onAdd={addTodo} />
      <OptimizedList items={todos} onItemClick={toggleTodo} />
    </div>
  );
};

React's performance optimization techniques include virtual DOM diffing, component memoization, and sophisticated bundling strategies that can deliver sub-100ms interaction times.

HTMX applications typically load faster initially due to smaller client-side bundles, but rely on server response times for interactions. However, strategic caching and partial updates can create responsive experiences:

<!-- Optimistic updates for immediate feedback -->
<button hx-post="/like" 
        hx-target="#like-count"
        onclick="this.querySelector('.count').textContent++">
  👍 <span class="count">42</span>
</button>

<!-- Intelligent caching with conditional requests -->
<div hx-get="/expensive-data"
     hx-trigger="click"
     hx-target="#results"
     hx-headers='{"If-None-Match": "cached-value"}'>
</div>

<!-- Streaming responses for large datasets -->
<div hx-get="/large-dataset"
     hx-target="#data-container"
     hx-swap="afterbegin"
     hx-trigger="intersect">
</div>

HTMX performance depends heavily on server-side optimization, network latency, and caching strategies, but can achieve excellent perceived performance through progressive enhancement.

Development experience

The day-to-day development experience varies significantly between these approaches, affecting team productivity, onboarding time, and long-term maintenance.

React development involves sophisticated tooling, comprehensive testing frameworks, and rich development environments that support complex applications:

// Modern React development with TypeScript
interface User {
  id: number;
  name: string;
  email: string;
}

const useUserManagement = () => {
  const [users, setUsers] = useState<User[]>([]);
  const [loading, setLoading] = useState(false);

  const fetchUsers = useCallback(async () => {
    setLoading(true);
    try {
      const response = await fetch('/api/users');
      const userData = await response.json();
      setUsers(userData);
    } finally {
      setLoading(false);
    }
  }, []);

  return { users, loading, refetch: fetchUsers };
};

// Component testing
test('displays users after loading', async () => {
  const mockUsers = [{ id: 1, name: 'John', email: 'john@example.com' }];

  jest.spyOn(global, 'fetch').mockResolvedValue({
    ok: true,
    json: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(mockUsers)
  });

  render(<UserList />);
  await waitFor(() => {
    expect(screen.getByText('John')).toBeInTheDocument();
  });
});

React's development ecosystem includes hot reloading, comprehensive error boundaries, and debugging tools that make complex application development manageable.

HTMX development focuses on server-side logic with minimal client-side complexity, often resulting in faster development cycles for traditional web applications:

<!-- Simple, testable markup -->
<div id="user-management">
  <form hx-get="/users/search" 
        hx-target="#user-results"
        hx-trigger="input delay:300ms from:input[name='search']">
    <input type="text" name="search" placeholder="Search users..." />
  </form>

  <div id="user-results" hx-get="/users" hx-trigger="load">
    <!-- Server renders initial user list -->
  </div>
</div>

<!-- Server-side template (Django example) -->
{% for user in users %}
  <div class="user-card" id="user-{{ user.id }}">
    <h3>{{ user.name }}</h3>
    <button hx-delete="/users/{{ user.id }}"
            hx-target="#user-{{ user.id }}"
            hx-confirm="Delete {{ user.name }}?">
      Delete
    </button>
  </div>
{% endfor %}

Testing focuses on server-side logic:

class UserManagementTest(TestCase):
    def test_user_search(self):
        User.objects.create(name="John Doe", email="john@example.com")

        response = self.client.get('/users/search?search=john')
        self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 200)
        self.assertContains(response, "John Doe")

HTMX development often feels more straightforward to developers familiar with traditional web development, requiring less JavaScript expertise while still delivering modern user experiences.

Ecosystem and community

The surrounding ecosystem and community support significantly impact long-term project success and developer productivity.

React boasts the largest ecosystem in frontend development, with thousands of libraries, components, and tools that accelerate development across diverse use cases:

// Rich ecosystem examples
import { BrowserRouter, Routes, Route } from 'react-router-dom';
import { QueryClient, QueryClientProvider, useQuery } from '@tanstack/react-query';
import { Formik, Form, Field } from 'formik';
import { Button, TextField } from '@mui/material';

const queryClient = new QueryClient();

const App = () => (
  <QueryClientProvider client={queryClient}>
    <BrowserRouter>
      <Routes>
        <Route path="/users" element={<UserManagement />} />
        <Route path="/analytics" element={<Dashboard />} />
      </Routes>
    </BrowserRouter>
  </QueryClientProvider>
);

// Form handling with validation
const UserForm = () => (
  <Formik
    initialValues={{ name: '', email: '' }}
    onSubmit={async (values) => await createUser(values)}
  >
    <Form>
      <Field as={TextField} name="name" label="Name" />
      <Field as={TextField} name="email" label="Email" />
      <Button type="submit">Submit</Button>
    </Form>
  </Formik>
);

React's ecosystem includes solutions for state management, routing, forms, UI components, testing, and virtually every other frontend concern.

HTMX's ecosystem is smaller but growing, with extensions and integrations that enhance its hypermedia approach:

<!-- HTMX extensions -->
<!-- WebSocket integration -->
<div hx-ext="ws" ws-connect="/chatroom">
  <div id="chat-messages" ws-send></div>
  <form ws-send>
    <input type="text" name="message" />
    <button type="submit">Send</button>
  </form>
</div>

<!-- Server-sent events -->
<div hx-ext="sse" sse-connect="/live-updates">
  <div sse-swap="notification" hx-target="#notifications"></div>
  <div sse-swap="user-count" hx-target="#user-count"></div>
</div>

<!-- Enhanced UX with CSS transitions -->
<button hx-post="/like"
        hx-target="#like-button"
        class="htmx-request:opacity-50 transition-opacity">
  Like
</button>

HTMX integrates well with any server-side framework and CSS framework, making it highly adaptable to existing technology stacks.

When to choose each technology

The decision between HTMX and React should align with your project requirements, team expertise, and long-term goals.

Choose React when your application requires:

Rich client-side interactivity with complex state management needs. Applications like collaborative editors, real-time dashboards, or sophisticated data visualization tools benefit from React's component architecture and client-side processing power.

Offline functionality and progressive web app capabilities. React's ecosystem provides excellent support for service workers, caching strategies, and offline-first architectures that keep applications functional without network connectivity.

Mobile development requirements. React Native enables code sharing between web and mobile platforms, making React a strategic choice for teams building across multiple platforms.

Large development teams where component reusability and clear architectural boundaries are essential. React's component system scales well across large codebases and distributed teams.

Choose HTMX when your project involves:

Traditional web applications with server-side rendering requirements. HTMX excels at enhancing existing server-rendered applications with modern interactivity without requiring architectural overhauls.

Teams with strong backend expertise but limited frontend JavaScript knowledge. HTMX allows backend developers to create interactive interfaces using familiar server-side patterns.

Applications where SEO and initial page load performance are critical. HTMX applications load faster initially and work well with search engines without additional configuration.

Projects with tight deadlines where rapid development is prioritized over complex client-side features. HTMX can add interactivity to existing applications with minimal code changes.

Final thoughts

This comprehensive comparison of HTMX and React reveals two fundamentally different approaches to building modern web applications.

React remains the powerhouse for complex, client-side applications that require sophisticated state management, rich interactivity, and extensive ecosystem support. Its component-based architecture and vast community make it ideal for large-scale applications and teams with strong JavaScript expertise.

HTMX offers a compelling alternative for developers who prefer server-centric architectures and HTML-first development. Its simplicity and effectiveness make it particularly appealing for enhancing traditional web applications and teams prioritizing rapid development.

Both technologies represent valid approaches to modern web development. React excels in client-side complexity and rich user interfaces, while HTMX shines in simplicity and server-side integration.

Your choice should ultimately depend on your specific project requirements, team capabilities, and architectural preferences. Consider React for complex, interactive applications and HTMX for enhanced traditional web applications that benefit from modern interactivity without client-side complexity.

Got an article suggestion? Let us know

Explore more

Django vs React

Compare Django vs React for web development. Learn costs, performance, team requirements, and when to choose each technology for your project.

Top Next.js Alternatives for Web Developers in 2025

Looking for a Next.js alternative in 2025? Explore the top frameworks that offer better flexibility, performance, and developer experience. Compare React Router v7, SvelteKit, TanStack Start, Nuxt.js, Astro 5, and Gatsby—all tested for real-world use

Next.js vs Remix vs Nuxt 3

Compare Next.js, Remix, and Nuxt 3. These popular meta-frameworks help you build modern web apps using React or Vue. Learn their differences, strengths, and ideal use cases to choose the best one for your project.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.