FireHydrant vs Squadcast: An Incident Management comparison for 2026

Within ten months of each other, both of these companies stopped being independent. SolarWinds agreed to buy Squadcast in March 2025 and renamed the product SolarWinds Incident Response a year later. Freshworks announced its FireHydrant deal in December 2025 and closed it on January 5, 2026. Two incident startups that spent years pitching themselves as the modern alternative to PagerDuty now sit inside large IT software portfolios, and if you are choosing between them, you are partly choosing which of those portfolios you want your pager to live in.

The products themselves still differ in ways that matter day to day. Both handle on-call, escalation, incident channels in Slack and Microsoft Teams, runbooks, status pages, and retrospectives, and both appear on most incident management tool shortlists for teams leaving PagerDuty or Opsgenie before Opsgenie shuts down in April 2027.

Where they put their effort is different. Squadcast is built to shrink the alert stream before anyone is paged, with deduplication, suppression of alerts that clear on their own, and on-call included in every plan from $9 per user. FireHydrant puts its weight on what happens after the page. FireHydrant is built to make every incident follow the same process, using condition-triggered runbooks, a service catalog, and change tracking, priced at $25 per responder.

This comparison covers the two parent companies, alert noise, paging, the two very different meanings of "runbook," reliability tracking, AI, and status pages, then prices both for a 25-person team.

Quick comparison

The table covers what teams usually ask first. Several rows that look similar behave differently, and the sections below explain those.

Two parents, two directions

Before comparing features, it helps to see where each owner is taking its product, because that shapes what you will get in two years.

SolarWinds is an observability and IT management company. It sells infrastructure, network, and database monitoring, SolarWinds Observability as SaaS and self-hosted, and an ITSM product, and it was itself taken private by Turn/River Capital in 2025. SolarWinds' stated reason for buying Squadcast was to join observability with incident response, so the obvious direction is tighter links between SolarWinds monitoring and the pager. For a team already running SolarWinds, that is a real point in Squadcast's favor. For everyone else, the familiar concern with private equity ownership is pricing, since Squadcast's low, published per-user prices are the main reason many teams pick it. If you want to see the rest of the field before committing, our roundup of Squadcast alternatives covers it.

Freshworks is a service software company, and FireHydrant now sits inside its Freshservice IT portfolio. FireHydrant told customers accounts, pricing, and support would stay the same, and the first visible result is a two-way integration that syncs FireHydrant incidents with Freshservice tickets. Freshworks describes the goal as one platform for IT service management, infrastructure management, and incident response. That suits companies already on Freshservice and matters less to an engineering team that has never used it.

The practical difference: Squadcast's parent sells the monitoring that produces alerts, and FireHydrant's parent sells the service desk that tracks the tickets afterward.

Before the page: alert noise

This is the clearest dividing line between the two products.

Squadcast: filtering as the headline feature

Squadcast takes alerts from more than 200 monitoring and DevOps tools and runs them through Event Intelligence, which deduplicates, tags, and routes them using rules and machine learning. Auto Pause Transient Alerts holds back notifications for alerts that usually resolve within a few minutes, so a flapping check that recovers never wakes anyone. SolarWinds' own customer quote from Redis describes going from tens of thousands of incoming alerts to hundreds.

All of this is part of the plans rather than a separate AIOps purchase, which keeps the cost of noise reduction low even for small teams.

FireHydrant: alert rules first, grouping on Enterprise

FireHydrant's Signals product takes alerts through webhooks and integrations and applies alert rules that decide who gets paged and how. Unlimited webhooks and alert rules come with Pro. Alert grouping, which folds related alerts into one page, is listed only on Enterprise, and FireHydrant does not advertise a feature for suppressing self-resolving alerts.

For a team with tidy monitoring, alert rules are enough. For a team whose monitoring fires hundreds of duplicates during a partial outage, Squadcast does more of that work out of the box and at a lower tier.

Paging and on-call

Both tools can replace PagerDuty for on-call. The pricing mechanics are where they differ most.

Squadcast: on-call in every seat

Squadcast has been building on-call since 2017. Schedules support weekly, follow-the-sun, and custom rotations with overrides, escalation policies run across multiple tiers, and Live Call Routing connects an outside caller to whoever is on duty. Workload analytics show how pages are spread across the team.

The schedule editor keeps rotations and escalation rules side by side, which makes gaps easy to spot.

On-call is part of every plan. The limit to check is notifications: lower tiers cap monthly SMS and voice alerts per user, and unlimited phone and SMS arrives on Enterprise.

FireHydrant Signals: included, but metered

Signals comes with FireHydrant Pro and covers schedules, unlimited escalation policies, and notifications by push, Slack, Teams, and email. SMS and voice notifications are sold separately, and Signals as a whole is charged by the number of alerts you send. Live call routing and notification policies are Enterprise features.

FireHydrant's Signals Migrator imports PagerDuty and Opsgenie schedules and policies, which shortens a migration considerably. Squadcast offers migration help too, but FireHydrant's tool is the more automated of the two.

Two meanings of "runbook"

Both vendors use the word runbook, and they mean different things by it. This is easy to miss in a demo.

FireHydrant: runbooks that run the process

A FireHydrant runbook is a set of steps that fires when an incident matches conditions such as severity, service, or environment. It can open a Slack or Teams channel, start a video bridge, create a Jira or Freshservice ticket, page the owning team, assign roles, and post a status update, all in the first minute.

Each step is readable in the configuration screen, so the whole team can see what will happen before an incident starts.

The catch is the cap: 2 runbooks on Free, 5 on Pro, unlimited only on Enterprise.

Squadcast: runbooks that fix things

A Squadcast runbook is a set of remediation steps that an engineer can execute from the incident, such as a diagnostic check or a failover script. Coordination is handled separately by the Workflows module, which fires on lifecycle events like created, acknowledged, reassigned, and resolved, and runs actions across connected tools, such as creating a ServiceNow record for every P1.

So FireHydrant's runbooks automate the people side of a response, and Squadcast splits that between workflows for coordination and runbooks for the technical fix.

Tracking reliability over time

Squadcast measures reliability against targets. FireHydrant maps the system and records what changed.

Squadcast: SLOs and service health

Squadcast includes SLO and error budget tracking, defined from metrics in your connected monitoring tools, with breach alerts routed through the normal on-call path. Service Health shows which services have open incidents and how each is tracking against its objectives.

Incident analytics cover MTTA and MTTR trends by team and service, plus alert volume and on-call load.

FireHydrant: service catalog and change events

FireHydrant's service catalog, included on Pro, records services, environments, owners, and dependencies, and runbooks use it to pull in the right team automatically. FireHydrant also ingests deploy and infrastructure change events, so responders can see whether a release shipped just before the incident.

Incident analytics exist but are an Enterprise feature, and FireHydrant does not track SLOs.

AI and MCP

Neither of these tools leads the category on AI, and both point their AI at different jobs.

FireHydrant: documentation AI on Enterprise

FireHydrant AI writes incident summaries into the timeline, transcribes incident calls, helps triage, drafts retrospectives, and suggests follow-ups. It is useful, especially for the post-incident write-up, but the pricing page lists all of it under Enterprise.

FireHydrant's official MCP server is open source, now published under Freshworks' GitHub organization, and runs locally with an API key, so assistants like Claude can read and act on incidents through FireHydrant's API.

Squadcast: AI for the alert stream

Squadcast's AI works on alerts. It prioritizes and isolates the alerts most likely to matter, improves deduplication, spots recurring patterns, suggests suppression and routing rules, and generates incident summaries. It does not attempt root-cause analysis, and SolarWinds does not document a public MCP server for it.

If AI investigation is a requirement, neither tool is a strong answer, and you should look at the AI SRE products covered in our alternatives roundups.

Status pages, stakeholders, and retrospectives

Both include status pages, with different gating.

FireHydrant's Free plan includes 1 public status page, Pro includes unlimited public pages, and private status pages are Enterprise-only. Viewer licenses for stakeholders who only need to follow along also sit on Enterprise.

Squadcast includes public and internal status pages with component tracking, scheduled maintenance, and updates from incident actions. Free stakeholder seats start on Premium, capped at 10, and are unlimited on Enterprise.

For the written review, FireHydrant is the stronger tool. Its retrospectives are built from a detailed timeline, and Enterprise adds AI drafts with suggested contributing factors. Pro includes a single retrospective template.

Squadcast offers post-incident reviews with templates, and its timeline fills automatically from incident actions rather than from the chat conversation.

The telemetry neither tool holds

Both products start working only after a monitoring tool decides something is wrong. Neither FireHydrant nor Squadcast collects logs, stores metrics, records traces, or runs uptime checks. Squadcast's SLOs are built on metrics pulled from your monitoring stack, and FireHydrant's change tracking shows what shipped but not how the system behaved afterward.

There is one nuance. SolarWinds sells observability products, so a Squadcast customer can buy monitoring from the same parent company. That is still a second product, a second contract, and an integration between them. Either way, your responders will spend part of every serious incident in another tab.

Pricing

The two vendors count different people, so the cheaper option depends on your team's shape.

FireHydrant

1. Free: up to 10 responders, 2 runbooks, the Slack and Teams chatbot, 1 public status page, and 3 integrations.
2. Pro: $25 per responder per month, billed annually, with 5 runbooks, unlimited public status pages, the service catalog, 5 integrations, Signals on-call, and SSO. Signals is charged by alert volume, and SMS and voice cost extra.
3. Enterprise: custom, adding FireHydrant AI, unlimited runbooks and integrations, alert grouping, live call routing, private incidents and status pages, analytics, SCIM, audit logs, and viewer licenses.

Squadcast

Squadcast's three plans run from $9 to $21 per user per month, based on pricing supplied to G2:

1. Pro: $9 per user per month, with on-call scheduling, escalations, event intelligence, and mobile alerts.
2. Premium: priced between Pro and Enterprise, adding runbooks, SLO tracking, advanced escalations, and up to 10 free stakeholders.
3. Enterprise: $21 per user per month, adding unlimited stakeholders, unlimited phone and SMS, and on-premise deployment.

There is no permanent free plan. Since the SolarWinds rebrand, some buyers are routed to sales and at least one third-party site lists higher figures, so confirm current pricing before you budget.

What a 25-person team pays

Assume 25 engineers, 10 of whom carry the pager, at list price. Because FireHydrant bills per responder, the table shows both ends of the range. Monitoring is excluded for both.

At list price, Squadcast is cheaper at every tier and team shape, except in one case: a team of up to 10 responders that can live on FireHydrant's free plan pays nothing. FireHydrant's higher price buys its runbook-driven process, service catalog, and change tracking. The question is whether those are worth more to you than Squadcast's noise reduction and SLOs.

Deployment and compliance

Both cover SSO, role-based access, and the usual security reviews, and both offer SCIM and audit logs at the top tier. Squadcast has two deployment advantages: an on-premise option on Enterprise, which is rare in this category, and availability through the AWS and Azure marketplaces, so you can buy it against existing cloud commitments. FireHydrant is SaaS only, hosted on AWS, with Slack Enterprise Grid and multiple organizations on Enterprise.

Which one fits your team

Choose Squadcast if alert volume is what hurts and the budget is tight. It is the better fit for teams drowning in duplicate or self-resolving alerts, teams that report on SLOs and error budgets, teams that need on-premise deployment or marketplace purchasing, and teams already running SolarWinds monitoring. Get price protection in writing on a multi-year deal.

Choose FireHydrant if your alerts are manageable and your incidents are inconsistent, with different people running them in different ways. Its runbooks, service catalog, and change tracking make each response look like the last one, and its free tier covers teams of up to 10 responders. It suits companies already on Freshservice. Plan for Enterprise if you want the AI, analytics, or alert grouping.

If neither fits, our roundup of FireHydrant alternatives covers the other tools teams usually consider next.

Final thoughts

These two were independent a year and a half ago, and that history still shows in the products. Squadcast does more to filter alerts before anyone is paged, while FireHydrant does more to make the response that follows consistent. Each now carries the priorities of a parent company whose main business is something other than incident response.

So decide which half of your last bad night you would rather fix: the flood of pages or the confused hour after them. Then look at the parent. If your company already pays SolarWinds or Freshworks, that relationship may decide this faster than any feature table.

Got an article suggestion? Let us know

Explore more

The 10 Best FireHydrant Alternatives

FireHydrant is great for incident management, but it's not perfect. Check out these FireHydrant alternatives and find the right fit for you.

FireHydrant vs Rootly: An Incident Management comparison for 2026

FireHydrant vs Rootly compared for 2026: runbooks versus workflows, where each vendor gates its AI, Signals versus Rootly On-Call, MCP servers, Freshworks ownership, and per-responder versus per-user pricing.

10 Best Squadcast Alternatives in 2026

Compare the 10 best Squadcast alternatives in 2026. Move from alert routing and runbooks to autonomous AI investigation with root cause analysis, code-level remediation, and built-in observability from Better Stack, incident.io, Rootly, Resolve AI, Datadog Bits AI, and more.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.